Remember, that white is part of black, which is the very definition of silver, in the poultry world.The Auburn Javas have a neat story behind them.
Garfield Farm Museum (in a far western suburb of Chicago) decided to raise a threatened heritage breed & chose the Java. In the 1990's there were very few pure Java's remaining, but they found a breeder in MN. To help in this quest, the Museum of Sci & Industry in Chicago decided to hatch Java eggs as part of their exhibit. (As a child, it was always my fav part of our visit.) Anyway about 15 years ago a white Java hatched! It was in the news & perhaps due to strong inbreeding, line breeding, dormant genes, or simply not enough genetic variety. More chicks with white & also auburn portions started hatching, so those were bred back to the fathers in a successful attempt to bring back those varieties. A few years ago, my DD had a long conversation with someone who purchased & continued to breed the Garfield Museum's line of Auburn Javas. She was offered some hatching eggs if she was interested in helping in the effort to bring back the auburn Javas. It was her 1st year in 4H & she had just won Best in Show for her poultry science project. She decided that she wanted to try out several breeds in a mixed flock before settling a single breed. She still hasn't picked a single breed. Now I kind of wish we had at least exchanged contact info.
Anyway, in the case of the Javas, they had a unique opportunity to hatch several 1000s of chicks every year for a couple decades. I doubt many breeders would have the volume to work with their flock's genetics on such a large scale.
The issue with the Java was the fact (as far as all of us know in the USA) there never was, an Auburn Java...so bringing it back was ????????????????????? This story is told & retold within the SPPA and Monte Bowen and the others who gave the Garfield MUS their birds in the first place never had any red birds, ever.
That said, if you want more details, get ahold of members of the SPPA.
I am not going either way with the subject, other than what I have seen in my lifetime. If you want exact details, talk to the horses' mouth, and I talk to them a few times every week....Duane Urch & Monte Bowen and a few other long time breeders, and they scold me when I even bring up the subject of a Java of any other color than the very definetion of the breed...Black Javas, are exactly that.
Incindently, if anyone wants SQ Black Javas, Monte is still shipping hatching eggs.
PM me & I will give you his e-mail addy.
He gets cranky (

His quote to me was that "someone is breeding poop into the line, either by mistake or on purpose"
And that is absolutely true.
You will get a white from a black, on rare occasion, or in the case of the Black Java, you'd get a mottled...
Black.or white.................that is silver.
There is no other color, just black & white.
In order to have any other color, it was introduced.
Wether someone decided at that time to """save""" them, is not the issue.
The very issue is that impure blood was introduced.
Had to be.
He kicks my @@@ if I say otherwise....and I greatly appreciate his friendship.
And still, to this day, NO heritage Black Java "supplier" to the Garfield Museum, even aknowledges that there might be such a bird.
Look at Duane Urches' breeds:
http://standardbreedpoultry.com/breeder/Duane UrchUrch-Turnland poultry/190
They deny there is any red in the breed, and if so, it was blood introduced in the last 10 years.
Sad.....................these old guys worked very hard their whole lives to protect & keep these black & mottled Javas pure....and someone, just 1 someone, messed it up.
My point about the """Auburn Java""" stays exactly as I said when ""IT"" first came about:::
And that is it is a new breed, obviously...and should not be referred to as a "Black java""
So if you want to change colors & shapes and WEIGHTS of a breed..........then you should name it it's own name !
A Black java is a Black Java.
The other that is full of red genes, is obviously not a black java...and it needs its own name.
Monte has hatched (and so has Urch) millions of chicks, and none has ever emerged as red, and Monte still says, he would like to know WHO is deliberately fouling the bloodline.
So, don't shoot me, I am just telling you what they all say about it, and to add to that, they really hate "designer" chickens and those of "us" who """GO""" for a breed simply because it is """PRETTY""" instead of trying to save or "bring back" a heritage breed.
I get lectured on a regular basis just because I have Sulmtalers and Bielefelders....like I should be saving an American breed.....seriously...
********************You all know this is ramblings and not intended to hurt anyone's feelings....******
There is so many old poultry people who HATE any new colors and/or breeds, especially those old guys who have dedicated their lives to the purity and type to the SOP, their intire lives, only to have some "whipper Snapper" come along and say he has an Auburn java...this infuriates the old guys ! I know they tolerate me, and my ideas, but not a month goes by that one or more of them do not say to me "There are plenty of American heritage Breeds that need work and/or saving" and I know they are not happy about the new breeds, especially the "designer colors" To the old poultry people, these new colors are just proof that impure blood has deliberatly been introduced, rendering the bird a mutt.
I sympathize, but I would also be the first to run out and buy some Silver laced Orpingtons, too!

Last edited: