Ha ha! Thanks, everyone, SO much!
@Dances: You're making me blush.
It seems like every article about anything I know stuff about contains at least *something* that makes me roll my eyes. I hope mine won't be that way, but I'm sure there are bits that folks will disagree with or that may even be things that later I'll look back on and think, "geez, that wasn't right! Now I know better!"
I wanted to add that the article is written for folks who have never had ducks and aren't sure what the point is, so it probably doesn't contain anything everyone here doesn't already know.
But it was fun to write and I hope it's an entertaining read and of course, I'm helping contribute to the growth of the hobby/industry!
As I'm sure is common to most writers, I keep looking at my manuscript and thinking, "Geez, that could have been much better if I had written it this way," or "Wish I could take that out and add more information about this" etc.
Oh, and I also feel bound to defend other writers by adding that sometimes, editors add things right before press that we don't even see till the article comes out, so sometimes our name might be on something that we don't even agree with. It's not usually extreme, but it does happen, and we just have to roll with the punches. And nothing against editors, either--I'm SO grateful for good editors, and they are often under a tight deadline and anyone can make mistakes, especially under that kind of pressure. So we just do the best we can & they do the best they can and... hopefully what comes out is something worthwhile. And at an organization like Grit, it usually is.