but no one said apa was saying that, just an australorp organization..i read it it did kind of sound like it was dictating, maybe they should put a footnote that international mens only us and canada..i could kind of see how geoff would get upset..
it would feel a little funny to some people if rir international in china had a dictation on how the standard was to look..i have a feeling there would be some upset people. and more than a few loud voices about it....so i see his point..no one also said the word dispicable..im not sure where your getting that? i said the argument about not liking english imports is like DESPISING your grandfather..they created the bird. it is their creation, like australorp is australian creation. ..if there ever were an international standard..they would have the lions share of input as we would on buckeye and rir..there never will be a true international standard, but things always evolve in poultry.
the word despise means not liked in certian circles.
OK, I have never heard despised used. If any breed club wants to use International to include Canada it has nothing to do with the APA and the APA does not dictate anything to any other country in regards to their Standards. I haven't read both Standards yet, but I would imagine the Aussie/Brit Standard for Australorps is very close to the same as the APA. Do you know what the differences are? I haven't read it yet, so I don't know. I know that their Standards for the Orps in the US and Britain are not very different. The Brits call for a smaller head and allow more fluff, but that is about it. I am still responding to your posts in the same vein that you post them.
I know what the word despised means and I have never heard it applied to the like or dislike of a chicken. I know what you are saying about despising your grandpa too, but it is off the wall as I said earlier. It is a powerful word. If there was an International Standard the Aussies and Brits would have to go with the featherlegged Marans as the APA and the French do. Get on the French or the Brits, the APA has nothing to do with dictating Standards to other countries and there will never be an International Standard. The Brits wont change it for the Marans as an example...and they have differences in our American breeds and I doubt that they have any intention of changing either. I am not sure why you like otomake the APA a bad guy.
The Aussie SOP has 200 pages and the APA SOP has 400 pages. The Aussie SOP barely describes anything and that is why it has so few pages.
Edit: Just checked the two standards. The only difference between the Aussie Standard and the APA SOP that I can see is that the APA SOP goes into much more detail. The descriptions appear to be the same......so I again don't see how the APA was pulled into this. Have you compared both?
Walt