I agree with flyingmonkeypoop. Years ago I had an project on introducing new colors into Polish(main goal were BBR, Cuckoo and Crele but also Wheaten). Many of the crosses or later generations looked exactly like these, minus the leg feathering.
The blacks especially have a type that deviates way too far from pure sultan(very short and deep bodies, plus short tail. Necks too thick). I think this is another indication of outcrossing. If I hadn't known those were supposed to be sultans, would have guessed the blacks as being silkie crosses/mixes.
Also notice they appear to have dark legs.. aren't sultans supposed to have slate legs? It just seems too incredible of a concidence for the birds to "lose" the white and slate legs out of a pure line.
Anybody(flyingmonkeypoop?) confirm for me that sultans have recessive white? I think that's a strong strike against the claim of their purity.
The blacks especially have a type that deviates way too far from pure sultan(very short and deep bodies, plus short tail. Necks too thick). I think this is another indication of outcrossing. If I hadn't known those were supposed to be sultans, would have guessed the blacks as being silkie crosses/mixes.
Also notice they appear to have dark legs.. aren't sultans supposed to have slate legs? It just seems too incredible of a concidence for the birds to "lose" the white and slate legs out of a pure line.
Anybody(flyingmonkeypoop?) confirm for me that sultans have recessive white? I think that's a strong strike against the claim of their purity.