I find it to be more than a little ironic, and actually quite sad, that acronyms that have been in use for generations are all but unknown among today's book poor text-speakers, yet they constantly feel free to make up new ones of their own out of sheer laziness in typing out the words, for breeds and varieties which are not universally known by the abbreviations they choose. They don't get, and seemingly don't care that unless one is involved in a conversation from the start, seeing the entire context, the average person has no idea what the shortcuts they use actually mean. The practice is rampant here.
=================
Yup, Narragansett,
It kinda makes me nuts.
Like when folk decide to call a variety by a name which fits the colors they see, but isn't correct genetics for the bird.
A classic example is the Golden Salmon Marans community. GSM are wild-type, i.e., BBR cock w/the salmon-breasted, stippled hen. Yet they call them Red Duckwing, Golden Duckwing. Yes, there could
seem to be "red" (really salmon) in the hens breast but Red Duckwing is
actually wildtype with Mh added
Or yes, GSM is a duckwing with the gold gene, but a Golden Duckwing carries the Silver gene
Even calling them Gold Duckwing is
less than appropriate because, while it can be viewed as correct, it
also can be viewed as incorrect depending on the connotation. How on earth can folk breed a fowl when they aren't using correct nomenclature to describe it?
Karen