Not having all this formal education, I look at things that I have worked with, read about or seen first hand. So, lets look at this fact, in 2004 bobcats killed ove 11,000 sheep. This same year coyotes killed over 135,000; dogs killed over 29,000; mountain lion over 12,000; bear over 8,000; eagles over 6,000 and fox over 4,000. Using these facts, a bobcat is the fourth leading killer of sheep. A fair size animal. Attacks on humans, Death Valley a woman was attacked poolside at an inn, West Chaple Fl. a man was attacked at his home, Hermantown, Mn. a man was attacked at his home. Now it is a fact a bobcat can and will kill an anmial 10 times its wieght. Given this scale, even a 10 pound bobcat could kill a 100 pound child or the record cat of over 50 pound could kill a big fat man.
Working and living in the mountains, I have seen many people state that we are killing all are
wildlife. That the terrible hunters and land owners are killing at will. This is so far from the truth it doesn't even a response. But, I will give one anyway. Land owners are only killing to protect thier family, pets or livestock. Some years this could be 0, other years it be be in the over a 100. Either way, this will not harm the predator population. Hunters can be a little different, a true hunter only kills what his family can eat. No real damage here. Then you have the city hunter, he/she will go out and shoot anything that move in the wild. With the number of these people so low it still shouldn't hurt the numbers.
So why are the numbers down? People that don't have a clue of what they are doing moving out of the city for a better life. They think they are doing the poor animals a favor by feeding them. One of the worst things they could do for them. This causes the animal to lose all fears of humans. This fear is what keeps them going.
I have no fact on this statementbut, I would guess that for every person that moves out of the city, a thousand predators die. On the other hand, the animals that the predator feeds on goes up.
If people would have followed the ways of the Indians, we would not be in this trouble. They lived with and for the animals. They as hunters were the best environmentlist we could have.
And they didn't even need to go to school to learn this. Book learning is fine for some things, but it has no place trying to replace Mother Nature.
And NO, I am not an Indian. Born and raised in N. J.