- Jan 5, 2015
- 19
- 3
- 24
I know this is an older thread, but thought I would post a pic of a roo I hatched out of shipped eggs. Pure Australian araucana. He's quite striking, shame about the random black tail feathers tho.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know this is an older thread, but thought I would post a pic of a roo I hatched out of shipped eggs. Pure Australian araucana. He's quite striking, shame about the random black tail feathers tho.
Hi there, I'm jumping in this thread because I have some Red Pyle Ameraucana hatching eggs in the incubator now. I got them from a breeder that has been working on this color for years, and her males are amazing looking. They are shipped eggs though, so who knows how they will hatch.
I also breed White Ameraucana and over the last few years I've made many crosses and thus discovered that they are not white/black splits but are hiding wheaten and probably wildtype. I'm not complaining and that makes the crosses really spectacular looking and that is one reason I'm getting the Red Pyles; I'm hoping they will also produce interesting crosses.
However, one of my white pullets this year has salmon leakage on her throat under her beard, in fact she looks just like the Red Pyle females I saw this breeder show. Does this mean that I've got dominant white mixed in with my White Am line? I'm trying to get my head around the genetics involved.
Anyway I'll post pics of the chicks if any hatch (fingers crossed!).
Hi there, I'm jumping in this thread because I have some Red Pyle Ameraucana hatching eggs in the incubator now. I got them from a breeder that has been working on this color for years, and her males are amazing looking. They are shipped eggs though, so who knows how they will hatch.
I also breed White Ameraucana and over the last few years I've made many crosses and thus discovered that they are not white/black splits but are hiding wheaten and probably wildtype. I'm not complaining and that makes the crosses really spectacular looking and that is one reason I'm getting the Red Pyles; I'm hoping they will also produce interesting crosses.
However, one of my white pullets this year has salmon leakage on her throat under her beard, in fact she looks just like the Red Pyle females I saw this breeder show. Does this mean that I've got dominant white mixed in with my White Am line? I'm trying to get my head around the genetics involved.
Anyway I'll post pics of the chicks if any hatch (fingers crossed!).
Re: dominant vs. recessive white; you can tell for sure by breeding and hatching out chicks. Dominant white x colored bird will result in mostly white with leakage (like the hen you pictured). Recessive white x colored bird will result in all colored chicks (as long as colored bird is not "split" for recessive white). However some knowledge of the color in the breed is helpful. It seems to me that recessive white is much more common in certain breeds, like araucana and ameraucana, than dominant white because of the way the white was developed.Thanks Kev, I appreciate the input -
I went back and looked at the emails from this particular seller. She says the hen came out of a pen of whites and the daddy roo was out of a pen of blues.... She got her hatching eggs from a known breeder that does have duckwing pens, if that matters. For the most part, Araucanas are supposed to have willow legs, except white birds. This guy has yellow legs, I guess from the white genes in his background.
Depending on how many cockerels/pullets I get, and what color varieties, I may just use him for experimental breeding and see what I get.....
If I were to look at a white araucana, how could I tell if it was dominant white or recessive white?
There's a breeder in Phelan that I've been talking to, he has some gorgeous birds, sent me a pic of a partridge hen.... he can't ship, but we're trying hard to find a way for me to get those birds!