Has anyone asked Don Schrider his opinion?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who has said that on here? I do not recall reading a post where someone claimed to have "Champion blood line" Direct me to such a post. I do not know anyone making such a claim.
Ok. So the only topics aloud for discussion are up to you all? So if I have any questions or such then I should not ask the buckeye breed thread? I thought that is what this is here for. I only brought it up to get some clarity as to what you all would consider champion blood line since you seem to be the experts on this site.There is nobody claiming to have "championship lines." I don't remember reading such a post but I believe you. Chickielady took the first Buckeyes she has owned which she hatched from some shipped eggs (and she hatched less than 10 eggs). From those few chicks, she had a cockerel which won Reserve American Class twice (I think the only shows she entered and her first shows ever)-- so it is just Chickies' semantics, that's all. Chickielady, like you, is new to the breed and learning the semantics of talking & showing chickens. All she meant is she is "blessed" that from such few chicks she had one to win Reserve in the Class twice. No need to make more out of it than needed.
I saw an ebay Seller auctioning some Buckeye hatching eggs some months back where the Seller was claiming their birds had won shows and were champions, but I do not remember even if that particular Seller used the term "championship lines," but the Seller had a different way of saying the same thing Chickielady was saying (and the ebay Seller had the motive of making money, i.e. trying to sell eggs whereas Chickielady was simply very happy & proud of her bird [and she was not trying to auction eggs on ebay]).
This is really not a discussion since nobody on this forum is making such a claim. If someone was really make the claim in the way you insinuate, then I agree with you, it would warrant a full discussion.
I understand selective breeding. I just dont see how that compares to this discussion is all. Any true breeder selects the type that they are going after and culls the others that dont fit that type.Selection is selection . Horses did not become the super stars of equine sports with out selection. THe dutch became the number in world competition of horses thru severe selection and investing a lot of money in computers and collecting data to separate genetics from environmental factors. THey created a herd of horses to experiment on. Yes, we as americans find that horrific, but in the end thru the data they collected, they determined that some joint diseases could be reduced thru selection. AND they developed the means to identify which horses had the genetics to improve the population as a whole. THey were the first breed in the world to do this and others have followed suit. Why spend thousands of dollars to train a horse to olympic level only to have him fall short because his joints can't hold up. THat is selection. That is genetics. WHen was the last time you saw a million dollar chicken?