Calling All Rabbit Nutters

[1cock2hens]

...why?

If you are keeping up with the conversation you would know I was obviously commenting on the unplanned castration comments

 

[Kiki]

yes, that means she chewed his wee balls off and now I don’t have to pay a vet!

Oh my... Who should get offed?
Her for doing it or him so he doesn't suffer?

 

[muddy75]

Oh my... Who should get offed?
Her for doing it or him so he doesn't suffer?

He doesn’t appear to be suffering…..so no “offing” necessary

 

[MACCanadianCoop]

I for one am astounded that bunnies eat one another's balls

 

[Kiki]

I for one am astounded that bunnies eat one another's balls

Me too Mac. I'd off them both if they were mine.
Her for being nuts and him so he doesn't suffer.

 

[Kiki]

@Silkie Princess
How's the Feefers?

 

[Kiki]

Math Pop Quiz


Thing A.

Thing B.

Find the average weight of each wiggly thing first then tell me how many pounds each one weighs.


Bonus question Who is fatter?
@OneHappyDuckie
@ColtHandorf

 

[bgmathteach]

Math Pop Quiz


Thing A.View attachment 3263389View attachment 3263390





Thing B.
View attachment 3263392View attachment 3263393


Find the average weight of each wiggly thing first then tell me how many pounds each one weighs.


Bonus question Who is fatter?
@OneHappyDuckie
@ColtHandorf

Am I to assume that the posted 'weights' are in ounces? I didn't see any units. Hoping it isn't in grams...that is tiny!!! And no, I haven't ever see baby rabbits just after birth, so I have nothing to go by regarding units.

So, assuming it is ounces, AND assuming that I read the images correctly (bad eyes and a couple it was difficult to discern if it was an 8 versus 6 versus 3

So, assuming I read them correctly (2.260, 2.250, 2.286 and 2.211, respectively) and that the values represent ounces, this is what I calculated:

Average weight: 2.2515 oz( technically 2.252, because of significant figures), which equals 0.1407 (again, technically 0.141) lbs

Clearly, the 2.286 (if I am readiing the # correctly) is the heaviest. Heaviest doesn't correlate directly with 'fattest', though as I have no length measurement to determine a relative weight to length ratio to extrapolate 'fattest' from.

I did NOT use the technically appropriate significant figures below due to the closeness of weights:
2.260 oz. = ~0.14125 lbs.
2,250 oz=~0.140625 lbs
2.211 oz= ~0.1381875 lbs
2.286 oz = ~ 0.142875 lbs.
______________________________________________________________________
Second set of calculations just in case 2.286 is REALLY 2.236 oz:

Avg. weight: 2.239 oz; 0.139953125 lbs. (techinically, 0.140 since must round to 3 sign. figures post decimal)

Weights remain unchanged for first 3 listed above weights, weight for 2.236 oz = ~0.13975 lbs. (again, technically 0.140 due to significant figures)

and finally, if 2.286 was really 2.236, then the heaviest would become 2.260...note statement above regarding 'fattest' versus 'heaviest'

 

[bgmathteach]

I for one am astounded that bunnies eat one another's balls

Why? Aren't they considered a delicacy in some parts of the world???

I'll show myself out now!

 

[bgmathteach]

Math Pop Quiz


Thing A.View attachment 3263389View attachment 3263390





Thing B.
View attachment 3263392View attachment 3263393


Find the average weight of each wiggly thing first then tell me how many pounds each one weighs.


Bonus question Who is fatter?
@OneHappyDuckie
@ColtHandorf

Hmmm, did I misunderstand? Do you have 2 distinct wiggly things, @ 2 weights each not 4 wiggly things @ 1 weight each?
(btw, SOP in most instances is to average 3 readings for each, in case one is an outlier, it will have less overall effect.......yes, I know, but that is my Stats/Mathematical mind going, and it may not be practical with very wiggle things - though that makes it even more necessary for greater accuracy! )

Oh, boy. Okay, I will recalculate, but not until you confirm the # I should be able to read, but am totally unsure of!