- Thread starter
- #11
cluckingheck
i wanna be a cowboy, baby ( HELL YEAH )
and burt’s just:Copper (runs up from no where): I knew it! I knew she was your favorite!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and burt’s just:Copper (runs up from no where): I knew it! I knew she was your favorite!
definitely, they’re just as curious as chickens. though, i was a little worried they would’ve tried trampling the chickensIrrelevant but I love how curious cows are!!
Burt better play those cards right.and burt’s just:
View attachment 2315949
I agree. Counting as in assigning a value within a sequence is doubtful. However, I think they can understand more and less, as well as who is missing.I doubt they ”count” but chickens ingenerel defiantly know when a member of the flock is missing.I have never seen a rooster go looking for a hen unless he hears her calling out for help and/Or cackling.
yeah, i wasn’t meaning it as literal counting— more as being able to see if everyone’s there or who isn’tI agree. Counting as in assigning a value within a sequence is doubtful. However, I think they can understand more and less, as well as who is missing.
Either counting or knowing if someone is missing is still interesting. To know if someone is missing, then the bird would have to have some type of construct of each flock member. Each flock member would have an identity of sorts in that bird's mind. If they can remember a particular bird, or if only one was missing would be fascinating to know. One would mean individual identities with possiblity for empathy, the other would be a much simpler form of cognition.yeah, i wasn’t meaning it as literal counting— more as being able to see if everyone’s there or who isn’t