The topic for this post,has been,for the most part,quite interesting to me. To use a metaphor,I wanted to see which side of the fence,this topic would fall to. What happened,was something completely different,in my way of thinking. When corresponding to a news person or to a politician,proper syntax and grammar is compulsory not optional. That is spelled "grammar," nor grammer,nor gremmer nor any other spelling that might just pop in? Also,remember all of those rules from eighth grade English class? Rules like "i" before "e," except after "c" or sometimes "v." Spelling errors like there,their,they're;know the difference between these? Who,who's,whose,who is;lose and loose?
If you want to respond,by Email,to Neil Cavuto and don't want to come off "sounding like a country hick," then why do write like one? Why give Mr. Cavuto a way in? After all this guy graduated from college with a degree in journalism. Do you think he may know a few things about grammar rules and how to properly use them? In order for you to get your opinion heard you must be literate to be understood. Just my to,two,too cents worth.
All y'all take care!