Quote:
Yes, you are correct...I'm glad my mistake was caught so we can clear things up!
OK, this is my understanding of the chocolate gene, after doing some more research...
****************
The sex-linked recessive gene named Chocolate by the late Dr. Carefoot in 1995 is another dilution of Black pigment. The Chocolate gene is one of the few known sex-linked recessive genes in poultry. It may seem difficult to grasp at first, but if a female carries Chocolate, than she will be visually Chocolate. However, males require two copies of the gene for them to appear as Chocolate. Black males can carry a copy of Chocolate without it being at all identifiable. The only way to tell is to test mate. However, if the mother of the Black male in question was Chocolate herself, it is a certainty that all her sons will carry a single dose of the Chocolate gene. According to Sigrid van Dort, in her book on Serama Colours, the rooster needs 2 doses to show the color chocolate, while the pullets need only one dose.
Chocolate to Chocolate gives: 100% Chocolate offspring.
A Chocolate male to a Black female gives: 50% Chocolate females, 50% Black males (the males will all carry Chocolate). This is what I've been working on.
A Black male to Chocolate females gives: 50% Black males (Chocolate carriers) and 50% Black females (normal Black and does not carry the chocolate gene).
A Chocolate carrying male to a Black female gives: 25% Chocolate females, 25% Black females, 25% Chocolate carrying males, 25% Black males though it will be impossible to tell which males carry Chocolate.
A Chocolate carrying male bred to a Chocolate female gives: 25% Black females, 25% Chocolate females, 25% Chocolate males, 25% Chocolate carrying males (Black).
******************
Shelley-
This is what Sig has to say about chocolate hens in a post on SCNA (
http://www.scnaonline.org/scnaforums/index.php?showtopic=3787&hl=)...
http://www.scnaonline.org/scnaforums/index.php?showtopic=3787&hl=
"Working with a black rooster of at least 2 years old helps, but this will take another extra year to have a choc rooster (black rooster x choc hen gives no choc daughters and all split (black) sons) since its sex linked recessive."
So, if she is correct, how can a chocolate hen produce chocolate pullets from a not-chocolate rooster? Either she is dun, or the roos are actually splits, but she would still be producing black pullets as well...
Is this not correct?
Whew! Complicated stuff!