No, I genuinely am asking you to clarify what you disagree with. Is it science? Because, if so I would like to understand what possible reasoning you may have for doing so.hilarious. Running out of arguments now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I genuinely am asking you to clarify what you disagree with. Is it science? Because, if so I would like to understand what possible reasoning you may have for doing so.hilarious. Running out of arguments now.
I agree that it is a terrible thing to have to miss a funeral of a loved one. However, yes, I would still absolutely miss it, if it meant I did not have to later attend another one.Personally, what bothers me the most about the lockdown is this: Gatherings are limited -- even funerals are limited. Funerals, which are personal, very important gatherings of family and loved ones to remember, thank, and bid farewell to a deceased loved one. What if more than 50 people want to come? What if more than 50 people were touched by the person and want to say a few words about them and comfort their loved ones? Who has the right to ban family from family? What angers me the most about this whole lockdown is that people are being kept from seeing their loved ones. Sure, it's to protect them, but in times of grief? Of sorrow and depression and need? People need their families in these times -- it's cruel to keep them away.
I meant it in more of a, "if everyone social distanced and wore masks and all, couldn't the gathering number be enlarged?" way.I agree that it is a terrible thing to have to miss a funeral of a loved one. However, yes, I would still absolutely miss it, if it meant I did not have to later attend another one.
I disagree with people saying everyone should stay home and not live their lives. I disagree with people blaming others for their inability to keep themselves healthy. I’m aware many people cannot control this because of disease. The people that swing by McDonald’s every day or don’t bother to exercise are the obvious exception. If they can’t be bothered to help themselves how can they expect others to make sacrifices to help them?No, I genuinely am asking you to clarify what you disagree with. Is it science? Because, if so I would like to understand what possible reasoning you may have for doing so.
If that helps to slow the spread and exposure, yes. What is unreasonable about that?But yet you want everyone to stay home or just wear a mask?
Actually what is it exactly you want everyone to do?
Which one? Staying home and businesses being hammered with 25% capacity isn’t sustainable for very long. 1/3 of all small business have already closed down here. When does it end?If that helps to slow the spread and exposure, yes. What is unreasonable about that?
Ok, so, do you not see the flaws in that logic? Apparently not, so I will go through and point it out then?I disagree with people saying everyone should stay home and not live their lives. I disagree with people blaming others for their inability to keep themselves healthy. I’m aware many people cannot control this because of disease. The people that swing by McDonald’s every day or don’t bother to exercise are the obvious exception. If they can’t be bothered to help themselves how can they expect others to make sacrifices to help them?
I strongly disagree. There has been a great many times in my life that words on a screen brought more comfort to me than anything said or done in person.words on a screen are good, but words in person, from one person to another, are best.