NO, it is actually ALL opinion. Does anyone believe than the infection rate will be much less than 100% eventually. We chose ( were commanded ) to take the opposite path of the standard treatment in a pandemic. Instead of isolating sick and at risk people we isolated everyone. We will probably never know if that was the correct path though there will be probably be plenty of opinions.Text in purple is factual; text in red is opinion.
Although you have a right to your own body, your choice to willfully be sick ends where another’s right to be healthy begins. For that reason, people who “opt out” of vaccines should be opted out of society.
Freedom doesn’t mean “I can do whatever I want, whenever I want.” You can’t drive without a seatbelt and you can’t ride a motorcycle without a helmet. When we choose to live in a society, there are certain obligations—both moral and legal—to which we are bound. You cannot inflict harm or infringe on the rights and liberties of those around you.
Your moral and legal obligations to the safety of others can even curtail combinations of your rights. Even though consuming alcohol and driving are both legal activities, they are not legal when performed together. Nearly 11,000 people die every year because people choose to exercise their “rights” inappropriately.
The exact same reasoning applies to vaccination.
There is no moral difference between a drunk driver and a willfully unvaccinated person.
I disagree with the author's first opinion; I agree with the last two. The substance of what I posted is factual, though. (Yes, even though it's an op-ed. Op-eds have facts; facts are kind of hard to get away from, actually.)
Before you seriously consider the opinions of someone who wants to start to "opt out" their neighbors you may want to consider where that will lead. Civil Wars don't have a 99% survival rate.