It may, it may not. Depends on how and why. There's a lot of people in prison for some pretty minor non-violent infractions, like weed possession. Those people released early have a better chance of reintegrating into society and a longer sentence doesn't actually make us any safer. So it may be more beneficial long-term.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...vent_history_analysis_of_a_jail-based_programhttps://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/five-things-about-deterrencehttps://www.brookings.edu/research/twelve-facts-about-incarceration-and-prisoner-reentry/
And changing people over to house arrest or releasing them early, especially if they have somewhere to go home to, also helps flatten the curve and keep our hospitals from being overwhelmed.
Ultimately if someone has a violent infraction I'm sure they'll stay put. But this WILL sweep through prisons aggressively and the people there - staff and prisoners alike - will be affected. And they are still humans too.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...vent_history_analysis_of_a_jail-based_programhttps://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/five-things-about-deterrencehttps://www.brookings.edu/research/twelve-facts-about-incarceration-and-prisoner-reentry/
And changing people over to house arrest or releasing them early, especially if they have somewhere to go home to, also helps flatten the curve and keep our hospitals from being overwhelmed.
Ultimately if someone has a violent infraction I'm sure they'll stay put. But this WILL sweep through prisons aggressively and the people there - staff and prisoners alike - will be affected. And they are still humans too.

) . Downside is not knowing. They don't know if they are immune. And I don’t know if I could have been mildly infected too.
