From Mr. "I would NEVER fund a gain in function project" Fauci.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/boston-university-lethal-covid-strain-lab
What sane person would think this a good idea?
All over newsfeeds is how Boston U research has been misunderstood.
Quote of the newsfeed articles
The news reports pulled one line from the paper's abstract out of context," said
Ronald Corley, director of the BU
National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratory (NEIDL), in an October 17
post on the university's website.
Unquote
Here is the paper
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.13.512134v1.full.pdf
Here are the first 12 lines. The lines are even numbered, although it is distracting in this format.
The recently identified, globally predominant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (BA.1) is
42 highly transmissible, even in fully vaccinated individuals, and causes attenuated disease
43 compared with other major viral variants recognized to date1-7. The Omicron spike (S)
44 protein, with an unusually large number of mutations, is considered the major driver of
45 these phenotypes3,8. We generated chimeric recombinant SARS-CoV-2 encoding the S
46 gene of Omicron in the backbone of an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 isolate and compared this
47 virus with the naturally circulating Omicron variant. The Omicron S-bearing virus robustly
48 escapes vaccine-induced humoral immunity, mainly due to mutations in the receptor-
49 binding motif (RBM), yet unlike naturally occurring Omicron, efficiently replicates in cell
50 lines and primary-like distal lung cells. In K18-hACE2 mice, while Omicron causes mild,
51 non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality
52 rate of 80%. This indicates that while the vaccine escape of Omicron is defined by
53 mutations in S, major determinants of viral pathogenicity reside outside of S.
Lines 61 through 64 say Omicron escapes antibodies more than the earlier versions and causes less disease in people and in test tubes.
Line 73 and 74, they put an omicron spike onto the earliest common strain. The combined version is called Omi-S.
Line 79 - 83 they test how infectious Omi-S is compared to the original strain (called WT) and to Omicron.
Line 84-86 They give the results: In 24 hours, WT spread to 89% of the cells in the test, Omi-S spread to 80%, Omicron spread to 48%.
Line 86-88 They give more results (different test for the same purpose): In 48 hours, WT spread to 60%, Omi-S to 41%, Omicron to 10%.
Line 115 - 131 They test WT, Omi-S, and Omicron is mice. Omi-S is 80% as damaging/deadly as WT. Omicron is not damaging/deadly.
Lines 132-140 They test the spread of the three versions in live mice. Results are consistent with the earlier tests.
Lines 200-431 They give specifics of how they did each step.
It seems like far more than one line to me.
Fyi, a different lab is doing the same thing with Monkey Virus. That escaped the prohibition on "Gain of Function" because it wasn't considered a risk to cause a pandemic... I don't have it opened, so may not have it quite right. And/or there is some hokey definition of "gain of function" that it doesn't mean making a virus more dangerous... it means making a virus more dangerous by using more than different strains of the same kind of virus.