I was replying to what was said to you. Assuming you were quite aware but posting it for anyone that comes along without replying directly to the OP. She seems not to want to hear my opinions but I still think others may.What's your point? None of those are wild type either.
I never said that there was recessive wild type, and I also never said anything about them having different genes because they're bantams. I just was trying to show the OP that chicks can have wild type-like markings and still be a completely different pattern.
Sorry for the confusion.
Last edited: