If they charged that much, we would get suspiciousWow. It's amazing they aren't charging $10,864 per bag, with this kind of sophisticated technology.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they charged that much, we would get suspiciousWow. It's amazing they aren't charging $10,864 per bag, with this kind of sophisticated technology.
I started out leaning one way, and falling another. There are plenty of people who have kept an open mind, waiting for more information. Many of them follow silently because of responses like this and others on this thread.Yes. As much as I could. But it doesn't matter. I've come to realize (several hundred dollars later) that nothing anyone does will make anyone change their minds regardless of where they fall on this issue.
Like, I get what your saying but I hope you realize how paranoid that sounds.Did you research who funds this lab? The people who run & own the lab? The workers in charge of the sample? I'm super curious about their credentials.
This testing has highlighted some less than accurate info on some feed.Aunty, you absolutely did more than your share. Don’t waste any more money.
Unfortunately, it isn’t going to change anyone’s mind, but the whole thing has taught me a lot about reading feed labels which is good. Thank you also to @U_Stormcrow for all his help on that too.
This topic more than any other has made me want an eye roll emoji to use in response to certain posts.
We need that!
I see it all as wanting facts. Taking in to consideration that there are such things as coincidences, as we all should. But do I want the people who make the food to also be testing it? No. That’s illogical. There’s nothing paranoid about wanting the whole picture.Like, I get what your saying but I hope you realize how paranoid that sounds.
Would you believe most government workers are good, honest people?
Funny how no one asks that about the vloggers spreading the bad info....
Instead it's
"you wave at the post man, a government employee, you must be in league with the government"
I wasn't either! It's a conspiracy, I tell you!How am I not on this list??? I could swear I responded to the original thread! I certainly followed it faithfully!![]()
You are right. I think after years of laying and raising chicks, they deserve to be spoiled and pampered!It is funny that people who don't have chickens think we keep them for eggs, but many of us have at least one old girl whom we spoil and isn't even laying.
I think you make a valid point. Good observation.I’ve been following silently. Thank you for sharing all of this information!! I started out unsure, but with an open mind, because how can you learn without facts? This has all been very helpful!
However I’ll add my two cents just because most of you folks do. I think the term conspiracy theorist is over used and creates issues in conversation. The second you call someone a conspiracy theorist 1) they don’t feel like their opinion is valued and they lose interest in talking with you and 2) that’s the category you lump them in and therefore do take them less seriously, if at all. It prevents open dialogue and I personally find it unnecessary. Should you have to change the words and terms you use? No. Do I expect you to? No. But I just wanted to throw that out there because I really like open, respectful dialogue from all sides.
Try flax seed. It's supposed to lower testosterone in "old roosters"Hey! Maybe that feed would work on humans too! Would this feed be the cure for PMS, PCOS or menopause?
Does it make roosters less frisky? Some women want to "calm down" their old roosters.