The raw meaty bones diet is my preference.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not a vet but went to school for it before I decided it wasn't right for me. They have no schooling on the diet of a dog besides what the dog food company tells them. I have no doubt that they're not a fan of the raw because it's taken money from their pockets. They don't sell raw food and if the dog is healthier, it doesn't need to be seen by the vet. So when the bagged food industry came to be, everyone's dogs started living 6 years longer? I don't think so.
I have real world experience with this diet on a lot of dogs. My own and clients. I've never seen salmonella or any other serious thing. Never. This is a rare happening. They must've really not cared for sanitation.
Yes, my dog will eat the entire chicken, legs head etc included except for the intestines. I keep some whole butchered just for the dog, pretty much just drain the blood in a killing cone and freeze whole. I usually pluck older birds but younger smaller ones will leave the feathers on. She also gets all the extras (heads, organs, feet, blood) from the ones butchered for people. Whole rabbits fur and all. I try to keep the base of the diet red meats since they are more 'species appropriate' and nutrient dense, but I like the ability to feed a whole animal once in a while too and chickens and rabbits are an easy way to do that.I am interested in the Raw diet for dogs - hubby says no way, but I think it would work well. Does anyone feed the dogs animals that they raise for this purpose?
K9Dave, it kinda sounds like you just feed meat, bones and some oils. Oh yeah, you mentioned hearts, kidneys and livers. Do you ever feed the skin and fur/feathers? how about feet and heads left over from butchering?
With nothing else added probably 70/30 just on the chicken bones. I add straight chicken thighs to increase that percentage as well as the fish and whatever meat I have available.I was wondering about this too. Your diet seems really bone heavy?
Yes, my dog will eat the entire chicken, legs head etc included except for the intestines. I keep some whole butchered just for the dog, pretty much just drain the blood in a killing cone and freeze whole. I usually pluck older birds but younger smaller ones will leave the feathers on. She also gets all the extras (heads, organs, feet, blood) from the ones butchered for people. Whole rabbits fur and all. I try to keep the base of the diet red meats since they are more 'species appropriate' and nutrient dense, but I like the ability to feed a whole animal once in a while too and chickens and rabbits are an easy way to do that.
many dogs have died from salmonella from packaged dog food.If you went to vet school, you would know vets DO in fact have classes on nutrition. In fact, it's a big part of the curriculum. So much of the health of an animal is dependent on nutrition. Just to be able to begin treating some conditions means the individual must have a solid background in it. Many schools also have clubs devoted solely to nutrition. I can tell you we've had multiple lectures on pros and cons of BOTH raw and commercial.
I'm not sure why you think vets make money off of food. This is just not true. We are taught to recommend a variety of diets to help the owner choose what is best for their pet.
If you look at the studies mentioned in my previous posts, you'll see salmonellosis can be shed from healthy animals in clean, lab conditions. Gastric enteritis is quite common in dogs, even without pre-existing conditions. It can be treated quite successfully but can still result in a costly vet visit. Salmonella can also infect humans and other animals (poultry, cats, etc) This is why RESEARCH is the key.
Dog food companies provide the Nutrition classes. Are you telling me that vets DONT get kickbacks from the food they sell in their offices?If you went to vet school, you would know vets DO in fact have classes on nutrition. In fact, it's a big part of the curriculum. So much of the health of an animal is dependent on nutrition. Just to be able to begin treating some conditions means the individual must have a solid background in it. Many schools also have clubs devoted solely to nutrition. I can tell you we've had multiple lectures on pros and cons of BOTH raw and commercial.
I'm not sure why you think vets make money off of food. This is just not true. We are taught to recommend a variety of diets to help the owner choose what is best for their pet.
If you look at the studies mentioned in my previous posts, you'll see salmonellosis can be shed from healthy animals in clean, lab conditions. Gastric enteritis is quite common in dogs, even without pre-existing conditions. It can be treated quite successfully but can still result in a costly vet visit. Salmonella can also infect humans and other animals (poultry, cats, etc) This is why RESEARCH is the key.
Very well said.many dogs have died from salmonella from packaged dog food.
The curriculum is indeed created by corporate entities. The studies are based on their views. Their recommendations are to feed their food for dog ailments, which were caused by their foods to begin with (allergies, kidney failure, etc.)
The majority of dog foods on the market leave dogs smelly, flaky, itchy and overweight. This is what grains do to the system.
Grains make up the majority of all prescription diets. They still use preservatives banned by the FDA for human consumption.
Vets make a LOT of money for selling the company's product to their patients. The pet food companies gain the trust of young vets with their free dog food and grants in college then the cut on the profits for every unsuspecting victim that buys into the whole flim-flam.
Vets that don't sell these prescription diets have a tough time scraping by, typically.
many dogs have died from salmonella from packaged dog food.
The curriculum is indeed created by corporate entities. The studies are based on their views. Their recommendations are to feed their food for dog ailments, which were caused by their foods to begin with (allergies, kidney failure, etc.)
The majority of dog foods on the market leave dogs smelly, flaky, itchy and overweight. This is what grains do to the system.
Grains make up the majority of all prescription diets. They still use preservatives banned by the FDA for human consumption.
Vets make a LOT of money for selling the company's product to their patients. The pet food companies gain the trust of young vets with their free dog food and grants in college then the cut on the profits for every unsuspecting victim that buys into the whole flim-flam.
Vets that don't sell these prescription diets have a tough time scraping by, typically.
They absolutely do need both sides but it needs to be facts.The curriculum is not created by corporate entities. I'm not sure where you got this information from. Many lectures were chosen by students. I've been to excellent raw diet lectures held by the school. These lectures presented both pros and cons of the diet so that we could make a decision for ourselves. The lecturer was a proponent of raw diets.
Free food or any item for that matter from commercial companies has been discontinued. I have not seen any free food or free item other than some pens. This was discontinued for the very reasons you stated, which I totally agree with. Many of my colleagues and I are not in this profession for the money, nor do I want to be persuaded by companies through free products.
I am presenting another side to the raw diet argument. I am not against raw diets but I feel owners need to hear both sides of the story.