Finders keepers. But what am I keeping?

From my iPhone today
254C30EE-8491-4D1C-8C5C-D3F621E3731E.png
 

Attachments

  • 5F6D9C47-17F6-49C9-A826-A2EF560AE808.png
    5F6D9C47-17F6-49C9-A826-A2EF560AE808.png
    5.4 MB · Views: 21
They would for having a muff, pea comb and feathered legs. Those are all dominant traits that are easy to get consistently in a first gen cross.
From what I am seeing, the muff and beard traits are incomplete dominant.
www.backyardchickens.com/threads/muff-and-beard-genetics.942770/

So they would not, in fact, show up totally consistently in F1 crosses. There are other traits we are ignoring as well, such as leg color, skin color and feather patterning.
Leg feathering, while dominant, is much lesser in crossbreeds (not as many feathers as feather footed parent) and it NOT a guarantee in an F1 cross. This is why folks get F1 Silkie mixes with both feathered and clean legs.

When I look at these birds as a whole, despite the small sample size of 4, what I am seeing is pretty consistent for (to clarify: to be) an F1 cross. But, like I said before, time will tell!

Edited for clarification, guess I used the wrong wording.
 
Last edited:
From what I am seeing, the muff and beard traits are incomplete dominant.
www.backyardchickens.com/threads/muff-and-beard-genetics.942770/

So they would not, in fact, show up totally consistently in F1 crosses. There are other traits we are ignoring as well, such as leg color, skin color and feather patterning.
Leg feathering, while dominant, is much lesser in crossbreeds (not as many feathers as feather footed parent) and it NOT a guarantee in an F1 cross. This is why folks get F1 Silkie mixes with both feathered and clean legs.

When I look at these birds as a whole, despite the small sample size of 4, what I am seeing is pretty consistent for an F1 cross. But, like I said before, time will tell!
Wouldn't an F1 cross be a cross bred, hmm?
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom