Quote:
That. Ask any red-blooded American to do what they do for 1/4 of their pay... just because.
Well, lots of jobs are hard and don't pay well. As I was always told if/when I complained about pay, "We have an open door policy here at Corporate, Inc.: The front door is open, and you can always walk out." But from a business perspective, over the years ALL the risk of the business has been shifted onto the farmers themselves and away from the processors and retailers. That was not always the case, and it certainly is not the case in just about any other production model: If, say, Olympus and Raytheon decide to go into business making spy satellites starting in 2011, and Olympus agrees to make the optics while Raytheon agrees to make the robotics, and Raytheon is the holder of the official government contract, Olympus does not just say, "Sure, we will build a whole new production plant with specially-trained security-cleared workers and hire ten new engineers just on your say-so that you promise to buy all the satellite lenses we can make in a year. Oh, and by the way, we will only charge you whatever the price is for lenses at the time of sale, not the current prices or even a fair price based on what it costs to make lenses. All our love, Olympus" No. They say, "We require an up-front payment of X to initiate small-scale production. If the small scale production meets the specifications we agree to, then we will require an additional payment to scale-up. On delivery of Y goods, pricing will be $Zmillion per howevermany in inflation-adjusted dollars. Deadlines are A, B and C for these milestones. In the event that 2012 brings a new administration and/or a new budget that ends this program, you will have to agree to buy all these lenses at this price anyway, or we will consider it breach of contract and we will see you in court." Prices are fixed from the time the project starts, not from the point of sale. That was more or less how the original New Deal ag subsidies worked--a guaranteed minimum payment was made to farmers. Most years, they produced more than the minimum and made a reasonable amount of money and paid into the equivalent of a national granary, which was the source of the gov't cheese, tinned pork, etc. In bad years, which were relatively infrequent, they got payments back.
Then Earl Butz came along with his notion that food was for selling, not for eating, and it all went to heck. I don't know why farmers put up with it, frankly.