I know what you are saying about the slippery slope but eating and exercise can be done responsibly. Inmates on death row were eating to get fat so they could not be hanged as they would be beheaded (cruel and inhumane )the same could be said for some on welfare or maybe they just don't care as it is free money. I suppose a case by case review would help, I could weed out the abusers and so could the system if they really wanted to. The best way to perpetuate a program is no increase it's members.
Quote:
This gets into a really gray area for me. You're fat, *perhaps* because you overeat or don't exercise, so why should you get benefits? But now we could really run with it. You have cancer because you smoked, or chose to work in a factory, you're in a wheelchair because you weren't wearing your seatbelt in that car accident, etc, etc. Is the point whether someone is at fault for being disabled, or whether they, regardless of cause, are still in fact disabled?
Quote:
This gets into a really gray area for me. You're fat, *perhaps* because you overeat or don't exercise, so why should you get benefits? But now we could really run with it. You have cancer because you smoked, or chose to work in a factory, you're in a wheelchair because you weren't wearing your seatbelt in that car accident, etc, etc. Is the point whether someone is at fault for being disabled, or whether they, regardless of cause, are still in fact disabled?
Last edited: