Bross63
Chirping
- Dec 18, 2016
- 58
- 24
- 56
Sounds cool! Do you keep them heated? I think I remember you mentioning you live in the Northeast.
dheltzel may do things differently, so I’ll be interested in hearing his reply, but I don’t provide any heat for my genetic hackle birds in the winter. They are a large and very robust bird, and I have found mine to possess great vigor as well.
I have read one hackle breeder’s speculation that extreme cold temperatures may help to prompt a more dense feathering over many, many generations as an adaptation by the birds to the environment in which they are raised. I won’t contradict this idea because I have no way of knowing if it has merit or not, so I’ll put it out there for you to consider and apply your own reasoning and form your own opinion.
I have a hypothesis I’m going to hopefully test this coming fall/winter when I expect to have the appropriate numbers of siblings from multiple matings with different cocks and hens. My hypothesis is based on the tremendous amount of energy required by genetic hackle males to grow the volume of feathers they grow (density, or number of feathers) at the rapid rate of growth they grow them. That alone is very taxing on a bird, even with ideal nutrition provided. Cold temperatures also tax all animals by requiring the animal (bird in this case) to burn calories just to maintain normal body temperature, calories over and above those normally required for regular body function and activity level. When combining these two stress factors - extreme feather growth and lower temperatures in the winter - I propose that one or the other (feather growth or maintenance of body weight/immune system performance) or both will suffer. I hope to disprove this as it will relieve me of facing the decision to either provide climate controlled housing or force my birds to suffer the consequences of overwhelming stress. However if my hypothesis is correct, it may lead to both increased feather growth and increased health in birds that are provided some support via even modest increases in temperatures for them during the coldest months. Even an increase to a consistent minimum of, for example 40-45 degrees vs the much colder night time temps many of us experience during the winter may prove enough to bring the combined stress threshold up to a level where neither feather production nor body weight/health are negatively affected.
I know it’s not possible for everyone to provide climate controlled housing, so even if my hypothesis is proven valid it still won’t change the way some of us will care for our birds. But if it can either provide assurance to all that it isn’t necessary or even beneficial or to the contrary that heat is beneficial (if not necessary) then we can each make our own decisions about if and how to adjust our setups.
Last edited: