For the past 2 weeks, I have been observing the temp and humidity inside my coop compared to outside temp and humidity, and so far I have noticed that my coop is about +5F warmer than outside air and about 8% less humid. To give some reference on my setup, I built a 6X12 coop with a gambrel roof on an old boat trailer. The idea was to make the coop easy to move. I have 10 hens, so almost 8 square feet per bird, because I expected they would stay inside the coop most of the winter, and that is what they are doing.
Anyway, here is a picture of the backside (working side) of the coop where I have the feeder and heated waterer inside the big doors. You will notice the vent towards the top of the roof. There is another vent of the same size on the front side of the coop. Those vents are left open all the time.
The main part of the coop is about 6 feet high, and the gambrel roof is about 9 feet high at the peak.
Here is an old side view of the coop where you can see the sliding window above the unfinished (at that time) nest box access panel. There is another same sized window on the other side. Those windows are cracked open all the time.
Some of the constructive comments I got from the BYC community was that I did not have enough ventilation. This is my first winter, and I decided to monitor the temp and humidity in the coop. At this point, I don't see any need to add ventilation if my inside coop humidity is less than the outside humidity. I am thinking my gambrel roof design with vents on both the front and the back, even though they are small, are more than adequate (for my 10 hens) due to the large volume of air contained in the gambrel roof design above the roosts of my chickens.
My question: Is the gambrel roof design inherently better for venting humidity than other roof designs, or is it just that I have only 10 hens in a coop (8 square feet per bird) that could probably handle 20 hens (4 square feet per bird)? If I had built a conventional gable roof of the same size, would the humidity inside the coop be more/less?
I ask because I have been considering building another shed that could double as a chicken coop if needed. The gambrel roof is more complicated to build than a conventional gable roof, but maybe the design of the gambrel roof just has more advantages. Thanks for any thoughts.
Anyway, here is a picture of the backside (working side) of the coop where I have the feeder and heated waterer inside the big doors. You will notice the vent towards the top of the roof. There is another vent of the same size on the front side of the coop. Those vents are left open all the time.
The main part of the coop is about 6 feet high, and the gambrel roof is about 9 feet high at the peak.
Here is an old side view of the coop where you can see the sliding window above the unfinished (at that time) nest box access panel. There is another same sized window on the other side. Those windows are cracked open all the time.
Some of the constructive comments I got from the BYC community was that I did not have enough ventilation. This is my first winter, and I decided to monitor the temp and humidity in the coop. At this point, I don't see any need to add ventilation if my inside coop humidity is less than the outside humidity. I am thinking my gambrel roof design with vents on both the front and the back, even though they are small, are more than adequate (for my 10 hens) due to the large volume of air contained in the gambrel roof design above the roosts of my chickens.
My question: Is the gambrel roof design inherently better for venting humidity than other roof designs, or is it just that I have only 10 hens in a coop (8 square feet per bird) that could probably handle 20 hens (4 square feet per bird)? If I had built a conventional gable roof of the same size, would the humidity inside the coop be more/less?
I ask because I have been considering building another shed that could double as a chicken coop if needed. The gambrel roof is more complicated to build than a conventional gable roof, but maybe the design of the gambrel roof just has more advantages. Thanks for any thoughts.