Centrarchid,
Here is the nutritional info on the Nutrena All Flock they all get:
http://www.nutrenaworld.com/nutrena...rewise-poultry/naturewise-all-flock/index.jsp
You can see it is significantly lower in calcium-- only 1.4% - 1.9%, compared to 4.6% calcium in the laying mash. And it is lower in fat and higher in fiber.
Soooo, do you think, once the laying mash is gone, I should maybe just stop feeding laying mash and go with the Nutrena all the time? I would love to be able to do this if I thought the girls could get enough calcium from the oyster shell on the side. I don't think they eat oyster shell very well, but I have seen some of them peck at it.
The laying mash does worry me, because sometimes, as hard as I try to keep the rooster out of it, he will find it when out free-ranging, spilled on the ground, if nothing else, and I know it is bad for him.
But I'd feel terrible if the girls got eggbound or something from not getting enough calcium from just the Nutrena All Flock and the free choice oyster shell. What do you think?