KarynVA
Crowing
Great post! And you do a good job of identifying the 'kickers' from the individual's perspective. However, this entire conversation is lacking with regard to the numerous 'kickers' that occur for society as a whole when people choose to experiment on themselves with something like ivermectin instead of taking the vaccine. Some of which include:...
The kicker with this approach is that, as many have pointed out, it has NOT been vigorously tested in the same way other products are, AND you have no legal protection should something go wrong.
1. Every unvaccinated person walking around in society is a vector for the virus to infect and mutate, again and again; potentially beocming more dangerous and resistant to the vaccine.
2. Every unvaccinated person can potentially infect vulnerable children and immunocompromised individuals who do not *have* the 'freedom' to get a vaccine.
3. Every unvaccinated person can potentially get very sick and take up space in hospitals, leaving no space for cancer patients and heart attack patients etc. to get treated. We've already seen this.
Ivermectin is only (debatably!) useful as a treatment after people are already infected. People who think only of themselves and decide to forgo vaccination and rely on experimental anti-parasite treatment are a danger to society as a whole.
Everybody is tip-toeing around this fact because nobody wants to make anyone else feel bad. In the meantime, children are dying because adults won't get vaccinated. It's heartbreaking.
Last edited: