That is why MDARD wants to "punt" to local authorities to decide the fate of your livestock.So, what are they going to do to those people who already have livestock (cows, sheep, chickens, goats...)? That's a LOT of backyard animals across the state.
Valid questions.What CAN they do?
What would become of the animals? Confiscate them? Kill them? The outrage from animal rights groups and others would be enormous.
Who is going to foot the bill for all of that? The original owners? If someone tried to confiscate and kill my animals and THEN charge me for doing it, they could count on a lawsuit.
Perhaps they will 'grandfather' those with animals, but what about breeders and those who wish to maintain permanent flocks, therefore new animals? Would they grandfather the offspring?
What about our children and grandchildren who want and may by necessity need to keep animals?
They would just wait for the old farmers and backyard enthusiasts to die off and they would get their way in the end.
There can be no compromise!
So far we have seen the armed DNR go onto farms and "order" the destruction of animals.
At the expense of the farmer.
Grandfathering is a legal myth with no weight in a court of law. It is considered a "privilege" not a "right.
Your children and grandchildren will lose the opportunity to decide if they want a farming lifestyle. The change is so onerous that even 4H and FFA may lose the opportunity to explore farming and animal husbandry. Keeping of any animal would be at the mercy of your local zoning board.
It would make a mess for most folks who want to be self-sustaining and provide good, wholesome food to their neighbors. Meanwhile, buried within the GAAMPs are easements for CAFOs to operate with little to no oversight in terms of animals welfare or environmental protections. Just how long will a local township permit small operations before they withdraw their "permission" to use your own land?I agree, KatherineM. It would make for a mess for some folks in some places. Here, we are in the township and they don't much care what we do to a certain extent. We have rules, but as long as we ask for permission for something, they can usually find a way to make it work.
Reminds me of the issues down in KY with the size of the land dictating whether it is a farm or not. As if you couldn't farm successfully on 5 acres? Bureaucracy.
The proposed changes have no consideration of the negative impact that will occur. Should the changes be approved, even the Agriculture Commissioners would be impacted. If they rubber-stamp the changes, then 3 of 4 commissioners would likely lose RTFA protection. The trouble is, they don't realize it.