• giveaway ENDS SOON! Cutest Baby Fowl Photo Contest: Win a Brinsea Maxi 24 EX Connect CLICK HERE!

My dog just bit someone!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Florida statutes:

767.04 Dog owner's liability for damages to persons bitten.--The owner of any dog that bites any person while such person is on or in a public place, or lawfully on or in a private place, including the property of the owner of the dog, is liable for damages suffered by persons bitten, regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owners' knowledge of such viciousness. However, any negligence on the part of the person bitten that is a proximate cause of the biting incident reduces the liability of the owner of the dog by the percentage that the bitten person's negligence contributed to the biting incident. A person is lawfully upon private property of such owner within the meaning of this act when the person is on such property in the performance of any duty imposed upon him or her by the laws of this state or by the laws or postal regulations of the United States, or when the person is on such property upon invitation, expressed or implied, of the owner. However, the owner is not liable, except as to a person under the age of 6, or unless the damages are proximately caused by a negligent act or omission of the owner, if at the time of any such injury the owner had displayed in a prominent place on his or her premises a sign easily readable including the words "Bad Dog." The remedy provided by this section is in addition to and cumulative with any other remedy provided by statute or common law.

History.--s. 1, ch. 25109, 1949; s. 1, ch. 93-13; s. 1155, ch. 97-102.

767.12 Classification of dogs as dangerous; certification of registration; notice and hearing requirements; confinement of animal; exemption; appeals; unlawful acts.--

(1)(a) An animal control authority shall investigate reported incidents involving any dog that may be dangerous and shall, if possible, interview the owner and require a sworn affidavit from any person, including any animal control officer or enforcement officer, desiring to have a dog classified as dangerous. Any animal that is the subject of a dangerous dog investigation, that is not impounded with the animal control authority, shall be humanely and safely confined by the owner in a securely fenced or enclosed area pending the outcome of the investigation and resolution of any hearings related to the dangerous dog classification. The address of where the animal resides shall be provided to the animal control authority. No dog that is the subject of a dangerous dog investigation may be relocated or ownership transferred pending the outcome of an investigation or any hearings related to the determination of a dangerous dog classification. In the event that a dog is to be destroyed, the dog shall not be relocated or ownership transferred.

(b) A dog shall not be declared dangerous if the threat, injury, or damage was sustained by a person who, at the time, was unlawfully on the property or, while lawfully on the property, was tormenting, abusing, or assaulting the dog or its owner or a family member. No dog may be declared dangerous if the dog was protecting or defending a human being within the immediate vicinity of the dog from an unjustified attack or assault.

(c) After the investigation, the animal control authority shall make an initial determination as to whether there is sufficient cause to classify the dog as dangerous and shall afford the owner an opportunity for a hearing prior to making a final determination. The animal control authority shall provide written notification of the sufficient cause finding, to the owner, by registered mail, certified hand delivery, or service in conformance with the provisions of chapter 48 relating to service of process. The owner may file a written request for a hearing within 7 calendar days from the date of receipt of the notification of the sufficient cause finding and, if requested, the hearing shall be held as soon as possible, but not more than 21 calendar days and no sooner than 5 days after receipt of the request from the owner. Each applicable local governing authority shall establish hearing procedures that conform to this paragraph.

(d) Once a dog is classified as a dangerous dog, the animal control authority shall provide written notification to the owner by registered mail, certified hand delivery or service, and the owner may file a written request for a hearing in the county court to appeal the classification within 10 business days after receipt of a written determination of dangerous dog classification and must confine the dog in a securely fenced or enclosed area pending a resolution of the appeal. Each applicable local governing authority must establish appeal procedures that conform to this paragraph.

(2) Within 14 days after a dog has been classified as dangerous by the animal control authority or a dangerous dog classification is upheld by the county court on appeal, the owner of the dog must obtain a certificate of registration for the dog from the animal control authority serving the area in which he or she resides, and the certificate shall be renewed annually. Animal control authorities are authorized to issue such certificates of registration, and renewals thereof, only to persons who are at least 18 years of age and who present to the animal control authority sufficient evidence of:

(a) A current certificate of rabies vaccination for the dog.

(b) A proper enclosure to confine a dangerous dog and the posting of the premises with a clearly visible warning sign at all entry points that informs both children and adults of the presence of a dangerous dog on the property.

(c) Permanent identification of the dog, such as a tattoo on the inside thigh or electronic implantation.

The appropriate governmental unit may impose an annual fee for the issuance of certificates of registration required by this section.

(3) The owner shall immediately notify the appropriate animal control authority when a dog that has been classified as dangerous:

(a) Is loose or unconfined.

(b) Has bitten a human being or attacked another animal.

(c) Is sold, given away, or dies.

(d) Is moved to another address.

Prior to a dangerous dog being sold or given away, the owner shall provide the name, address, and telephone number of the new owner to the animal control authority. The new owner must comply with all of the requirements of this act and implementing local ordinances, even if the animal is moved from one local jurisdiction to another within the state. The animal control officer must be notified by the owner of a dog classified as dangerous that the dog is in his or her jurisdiction.

(4) It is unlawful for the owner of a dangerous dog to permit the dog to be outside a proper enclosure unless the dog is muzzled and restrained by a substantial chain or leash and under control of a competent person. The muzzle must be made in a manner that will not cause injury to the dog or interfere with its vision or respiration but will prevent it from biting any person or animal. The owner may exercise the dog in a securely fenced or enclosed area that does not have a top, without a muzzle or leash, if the dog remains within his or her sight and only members of the immediate household or persons 18 years of age or older are allowed in the enclosure when the dog is present. When being transported, such dogs must be safely and securely restrained within a vehicle.

(5) Hunting dogs are exempt from the provisions of this act when engaged in any legal hunt or training procedure. Dogs engaged in training or exhibiting in legal sports such as obedience trials, conformation shows, field trials, hunting/retrieving trials, and herding trials are exempt from the provisions of this act when engaged in any legal procedures. However, such dogs at all other times in all other respects shall be subject to this and local laws. Dogs that have been classified as dangerous shall not be used for hunting purposes.

(6) This section does not apply to dogs used by law enforcement officials for law enforcement work.

(7) Any person who violates any provision of this section is guilty of a noncriminal infraction, punishable by a fine not exceeding $500.

History.--s. 3, ch. 90-180; s. 3, ch. 93-13; s. 3, ch. 94-339; s. 1157, ch. 97-102.


767.13 Attack or bite by dangerous dog; penalties; confiscation; destruction.--

(1) If a dog that has previously been declared dangerous attacks or bites a person or a domestic animal without provocation, the owner is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. In addition, the dangerous dog shall be immediately confiscated by an animal control authority, placed in quarantine, if necessary, for the proper length of time, or impounded and held for 10 business days after the owner is given written notification under s. 767.12, and thereafter destroyed in an expeditious and humane manner. This 10-day time period shall allow the owner to request a hearing under s. 767.12. The owner shall be responsible for payment of all boarding costs and other fees as may be required to humanely and safely keep the animal during any appeal procedure.

(2) If a dog that has not been declared dangerous attacks and causes severe injury to or death of any human, the dog shall be immediately confiscated by an animal control authority, placed in quarantine, if necessary, for the proper length of time or held for 10 business days after the owner is given written notification under s. 767.12, and thereafter destroyed in an expeditious and humane manner. This 10-day time period shall allow the owner to request a hearing under s. 767.12. The owner shall be responsible for payment of all boarding costs and other fees as may be required to humanely and safely keep the animal during any appeal procedure. In addition, if the owner of the dog had prior knowledge of the dog's dangerous propensities, yet demonstrated a reckless disregard for such propensities under the circumstances, the owner of the dog is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

(3) If a dog that has previously been declared dangerous attacks and causes severe injury to or death of any human, the owner is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. In addition, the dog shall be immediately confiscated by an animal control authority, placed in quarantine, if necessary, for the proper length of time or held for 10 business days after the owner is given written notification under s. 767.12, and thereafter destroyed in an expeditious and humane manner. This 10-day time period shall allow the owner to request a hearing under s. 767.12. The owner shall be responsible for payment of all boarding costs and other fees as may be required to humanely and safely keep the animal during any appeal procedure.

(4) If the owner files a written appeal under s. 767.12 or this section, the dog must be held and may not be destroyed while the appeal is pending.

(5) If a dog attacks or bites a person who is engaged in or attempting to engage in a criminal activity at the time of the attack, the owner is not guilty of any crime specified under this section.

History.--s. 4, ch. 90-180; s. 4, ch. 93-13; s. 4, ch. 94-339.
 
Quote:
Close, I said "most". But I think you just made my point for me. In previous posts you made these statements:

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Now you tell us this:

Quote:
So, why weren't you supervising your child? Should you have been "written up" for neglect like you think other parents should be? Wasn't that dog just "doing his job"? Or is it "different" when it happens to you?
 
Quote:
I, on the other hand, did plenty of dumb things when I was a kid. And I managed to evade adult supervision plenty of times, too. Come to think of it, I got bit by several dogs. But that was back in the days before people were sue-happy.

Quote:
Whether or not you think it's fair, if a dog with a prior history attacks someone, it will likely be the pet owner who is held responsible, not the victim's parents.

Picture yourself on a jury listening to a defendant:

"Your Honor, the child was looking over my fence into my yard without permission. I'm sorry she lost her eye, but it's really her parent's fault. Besides, the bites on my neighbor and the mailman weren't bad, so how was I supposed to know the dog was aggressive?"


.

I retired as from law enforcement YES I have been sued, but NEVER lost. A lot of opinions float and anybody could be sued for anything. WINNING a settlement is another story. Jurys are made up of twelve respected people, to be found negligent all twelve must find you negligent. If someone is going to live there life in this country scared of lawsuits then might be a good idea to hide completely from society, and then there still is no gaurantees that no one will sue you.

There is not a officer I know who has never been threatened with a suit at one time or another, should they all quit?
 
Quote:
My daughter was a guest in his home. She was there with his permission and he was supposed to be supervising the kids. He knew the dog could bite, didn't tell, and didn't keep it away from the kids.
 
Quote:
My daughter was a guest in his home. She was there with his permission and he was supposed to be supervising the kids. He knew the dog could bite, didn't tell, and didn't keep it away from the kids.

Like I said, it's "different" when it happens to you.
 
Real guard dogs know when they need to guard soemthing , you just cant say oops my dog bit you sorry he is guarding the place , unless the person bitten was breaking into youre place in the middle of the night or trying to harm or abduct someone from the property.

We had a husky mix when I was young and that dog was protective but he never bit anyone.

you really cant use guarding and protective ness to exscuse inaproprate behavior, its not fair to the public. Especally if you said he is jumping up to bite thats way agressive and way dangerous. And if you cant bring youre self to feel to bad about strangers that get bitten how about this if he has done this more then once someone will turn him in and at some point they WIll decide he is a dangerous dog and they will order him put down.
 
Some dogs bite. If your dog bites, and you know it, you have a responsibility to make sure it isn't in a position to do so again. Sounds like the OP is taking steps to make sure that biting doesn't happen again. Meter readers have to come on your property, and the company can't let tell everyone "your reader will come every third thursday at 10:22 am". I believe you basically give them permission when you sign up with the company. That being said, this dog is known to bite in certain situations...it either needs to be confined or retrained because it will bite again.
 
Details aside, the reality is as follows:

1. The dog bites, and has done it more than once

2. The dog needs additional training and socialization (especially at the gate)

3. The dog probably needs an enclosure where he can't have access to the gate

4. Despite the fact that people are encroaching on his territory, the OP will probably be held liable if it happens again, and the insurance rates will skyrocket or the policy be cancelled

5. If steps are not taken to train/restrain the dog and it bites again, the court will probably order it euthanised.

It may not be fair to the dog. It may have only been following its instincts. The people bitten may be stupid or the offspring of stupid people. In the end, it won't matter. Right, wrong or indifferent, the dog will most likely have to be put down if the OP doesn't get it some training and/or a separate enclosure. There are no quick fixes. It will take time and expense.

Regardless of the IQ of the parents, the law normally leans toward the concept that all citizens have a duty of care when it comes to children and dogs. The fact that the child was unsupervised will probably be irrevelant in court, especially since the dog has a history

You may find that the utility companies have right of way and meter readers must be allowed on the property to read meters at a time of their choosing. The law in most places requires that you show a duty of care to such people as meter readers and postal employees.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oblio13, we actually seem to agree on this. Action must be taken. Even though the injuries weren't serious, it could be worse next time. If we want dogs for pets, we have to accept responsibility for what they are and take measures to protect them, humans and other pets. They have to be trained and supervised and have a safe area to be in. Sometimes they even have to be PTS regardless of whose fault it is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom