Mystery Missile Spotted

[thaiturkey]

Quote:
Play the video on the left of this link. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/11/10/eveningnews/main7042324.shtml?tag=pop

Of course if you want to believe it was a launched missile then you're certainly not going to be convinced otherwise. Probably is was shot off by the second Dallas gunman or the same guys that mined the structure of the Twin Towers or maybe the same people that were working for FDR on the attack at Pearl Harbor.

Now you put it like that, yes, it probably was a missile.

 

[Q9]

Quote:
Play the video on the left of this link. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/11/10/eveningnews/main7042324.shtml?tag=pop

Of course if you want to believe it was a launched missile then you're certainly not going to be convinced otherwise. Probably is was shot off by the second Dallas gunman or the same guys that mined the structure of the Twin Towers or maybe the same people that were working for FDR on the attack at Pearl Harbor.

Shut up about the conspiracies, okay? I'm just stating what I know, and analyzing the facts based on that. I'm fairly convinced it wasn't a missile at this point, but there's still the possibility. I'd just like to have further proof, is all. Forgive me for not taking the all-knowing MSM at their word.

 

[redhen]

Quote:
Play the video on the left of this link. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/11/10/eveningnews/main7042324.shtml?tag=pop

Of course if you want to believe it was a launched missile then you're certainly not going to be convinced otherwise. Probably is was shot off by the second Dallas gunman or the same guys that mined the structure of the Twin Towers or maybe the same people that were working for FDR on the attack at Pearl Harbor.

Shut up about the conspiracies, okay? I'm just stating what I know, and analyzing the facts based on that. I'm fairly convinced it wasn't a missile at this point, but there's still the possibility. I'd just like to have further proof, is all. Forgive me for not taking the all-knowing MSM at their word.

Hey..hey hey..Shut up is a very rude word... not cool at all.

Do you need to put on your tin foil hat and go in the corner??

 

[Q9]

Quote:
Shut up about the conspiracies, okay? I'm just stating what I know, and analyzing the facts based on that. I'm fairly convinced it wasn't a missile at this point, but there's still the possibility. I'd just like to have further proof, is all. Forgive me for not taking the all-knowing MSM at their word.

Hey..hey hey..Shut up is a very rude word... not cool at all.

Do you need to put on your tin foil hat and go in the corner??

Very funny. It is incredibly annoying when people set up straw-man arguments to discredit people they disagree with, but that is exactly what Woodmort is doing. I don't participate in such crude logical fallacies to smear - or make fun of - those I disagree with. "Shut up" is quite simply the only way to respond at this point. My numerous polite requests for people to stop engaging in discrediting maneuvers have failed, so maybe putting it bluntly will get the message through.

 

[thaiturkey]

Quote:
Just so. Those who attempt to counter a suggestion, or even fact, with shouts of 'conspiracy theory' should accept that it is they who may be believing the conspiracy story.

 

[woodmort]

Sorry if you take umbrage Q9, but you asked for the Brit that proved that it was a contrail and information that an actual passenger plane was in the air at that time and place--the video clip provides both. There was no "straw man" about the rest of it, just an illustration of other cases where there is an opinion by naysayers that the government is covering something up even when there is good evidence that it wasn't. I find it both sad and very disturbing that we've becomes such skeptics--fueled by the Internet--that when a reasonable explanation for some event is offered we dismiss it out of hand as some government plot. This mystery missile is just the most recent example. The "them" that is out to get us is too often "us".

 

[Dunkopf]

Quote:
The explanation offered is the most logical. Missiles don't get launched by accident. Live ammunition is not kept loaded in a non war situation. Submarine missile launches require more than 1 person, so it wasn't some dummy pushing a red button. The navy wouldn't perform a launch that close to shore or if they did they would announce it. We have a system along each coast that picks up any transient noise from submarines.

So it's either a contrail, or it's a super quiet submarine that somehow got through our picket line and launched a missile to show they could. That's highly unlikely. I would bet on the contrail theory.

It is sad how little faith people have in their government. They will give a corporation every last bit of personal information they have. When the govt wants some info it's a conspiracy of some sort.

 

[FarmerJamie]

I accept the aircraft explanation.

Okay, I don't have photographic proof, but you'll have to just trust me on this.....

Last night about 5:30pm I was at the local gas station pumping gas. In the western sky, around the portion of the sky where you can sort of see the demarcation between the day and night sky (kind of a hazy grey line), I saw plume similar to the video plume. the sky was crystal clear. After watching for several minutes, I determined the plane was travelling west to east almost directly overhead. In the "sunlit" sky, there was no contrail. On the "night" portion of the sky, the plume held its shape for a length longer than twice the length of my index finger held at arms length. The wind was begining to twist and twirl the contrail.

Urban folklore along the south shore of Lake Erie claims if the temperature and moisture conditions are right, you can see Canada from the Ohio shoreline. Nature has many wonders.

 

[Q9]

Quote:
The explanation offered is the most logical. Missiles don't get launched by accident. Live ammunition is not kept loaded in a non war situation. Submarine missile launches require more than 1 person, so it wasn't some dummy pushing a red button. The navy wouldn't perform a launch that close to shore or if they did they would announce it. We have a system along each coast that picks up any transient noise from submarines.

So it's either a contrail, or it's a super quiet submarine that somehow got through our picket line and launched a missile to show they could. That's highly unlikely. I would bet on the contrail theory.

It is sad how little faith people have in their government. They will give a corporation every last bit of personal information they have. When the govt wants some info it's a conspiracy of some sort.

So what you're telling me is that I should trust an organization (government) that abides by no laws at all and has force of arms at its easy disposal with personal info, but I shouldn't trust a relatively harmless private company with it? I'm not sure I follow. I don't trust ANY large organization to a great extent, but a corporation (that ISN'T in bed with government to a huge extent) is far more trustworthy than a government, which has force of arms, disregards any laws it wants, and has no issue with killing or imprisoning those it doesn't like.

I trust those who have been proven trustworthy; that eliminates government. Nazi Germany - the Jews trusted government and wore the little stars. Not good. Soviet Union - the people trusted their government at first, look how that turned out. Communist China - the people trusted Mao, and in return he killed 70 million of them. USA, 19th century - the Indians trusted the government's various promises, which were promptly broken. Meanwhile, as much as I hate Monsanto, they've killed nobody, despite their connections in government.

I could cite many more examples of a lethal trust in government from the USA alone.

 

[dntd]

Alians did it! Honestly! They already claimed alians like to play with nuclear weapons!