I had no idea it was this simple. It's a high school or college level project with easily obtained materials.
http://www.ableweb.org/volumes/vol-5/8-fisher.pdf
Introduction
This method, referred to by students as chicks-in-plastic, chick-in-a-cup, or the omelette
lab, allows continuous observation of living chick embryos from day 3 to day 18 of incubation.
Differentiation of organ systems and extraembryonic structures as well as pre-hatching behavior can
be studied by students from grade school through college. For very young students, a
demonstration should be set up by the instructor for the class to observe. In high school or college
introductory biology or embryology courses, students can study developmental processes and also
practice in vitro culture techniques. For advanced developmental biology courses, project-oriented
studies of growth (Dunn and Boone, 1976), teratology (Pearson, 1983), calcium metabolism (Burke
et al., 1979; Dunn et al, 1981; Narbaitz, 1979; Narbaitz and Jande, 1978; Tuan, 1980), angiogenesis
(Castellot et al. 1986; Dobson et al., 1990; Sherer and Dostal, 1982), or osteogenesis can be
devised.
Early attempts to grow chick embryos outside their shells (Boone, 1963; Quisenberry and
Dillon, 1962) met with limited success. Bruce Dunn (1974), a high school student working in an
improvised basement laboratory, devised a method for growing chick embryos in plastic slings.
Working with Boone, Ramsey and Dunn improved shell-less embryo culture methods (Dunn and
Boone, 1976; Ramsey and Boone, 1972). Castellot et al. (1982) simplified the method further by
substituting disposable hot cups (chick-in-a-cup) for plastic tripods.
Since Dunn's publication of his method in 1974, it has fascinated grade school children, won
high school Science Fair Awards, and served as the experimental model for published scientific
research. The simplicity, adaptability, and elegance of this method make it a pedagogical delight.
In a world of rapidly changing technology and expensive equipment, the success of this method
demonstrates that ingenuity and brains are more productive than button-pushing for good research
and teaching.
Materials