No No No No No No!!!!

[TechnoCat]

Quote:
Ditto

as everyone can see there are FREE SPEECH concerns and that it targets more than infringing website which means ALL websites are in danger

EVEN MINE???
NOOOOOO!!!
I worked two years on it...
This is absolutly CRAZY!!!
auuuuuuuuuuuuuuugh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[willowbranchfarm]

 

[Q9]

Quote:
as everyone can see there are FREE SPEECH concerns and that it targets more than infringing website which means ALL websites are in danger

EVEN MINE???
NOOOOOO!!!
I worked two years on it...
This is absolutly CRAZY!!!
auuuuuuuuuuuuuuugh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Good grief, you people are being way too dramatic. The fact that you haven't seen this coming for several years is astounding. The only sites that will have issues at first will be large social-networking sites like Youtube, with a high level of copyrighted content. Odds are, they won't be shut down, but censorship will probably become rampant. BYC should be relatively safe. Other sites, though, especially dissident political sites, will probably suffer heavily from censorship.

Remember, folks - the government does not care about what they wrote. They can and will twist the meaning of anything, to do anything they want. Just look at how they've mutilated the Constitution.

 

[HollyBird24]

If the bill is about copyright infringement, why will it affect BYC besides people monitering what we post?

PayPal and Ebay isn't BYC, its convienient, but its not like the world will collapse without it.

 

[TechnoCat]

WAIT!
If we lose internet...
there's gonna be more than just the internet lost.
All the apps on your phones... (requires internet to work)
goodbye Byc, facebook, youtube, ebay, paypal...
We're going to lose Angry Birds and all other apps.

 

[Q9]

Quote:
But it's morally wrong and beyond the scope of Congress's very strictly limited powers, thus, it must be killed.

 

[willowbranchfarm]

Ok I feel better. Thanks guy's

 

[HollyBird24]

Alright, I think this is getting blown waay outta porportion by people who have no idea what any of it means. Nobody said anything about losing the internet.

 

[Q9]

Quote:
FOR THE LAST TIME, it's NOT going to shut down the Internet! Some sites? Sure. Censorship? Most likely. But the Internet and the vast majority of major sites will remain.

 

[hdowden]

wikipedia has the most info on the bill (all from wikipedia)

Supporters

Politicians

The Stop Online Piracy Act was introduced by Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX) and was initially co-sponsored by Howard Berman (D-CA), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Mary Bono Mack (R-CA), Steve Chabot (R-OH), John Conyers (D-MI), Ted Deutch (D-FL), Elton Gallegly (R-CA), Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), Timothy Griffin (R-AR), Dennis A. Ross (R-FL), Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Lee Terry (R-NE). As of December 17, 2011, there were 31 sponsors.[78]

Companies

The legislation has broad support from organizations that rely on copyright, including the Motion Picture Association of America, the Recording Industry Association of America, Macmillan Publishers, Viacom, and various other companies and unions in the cable, movie, and music industries. Supporters also include trademark-dependent companies such as Nike, L'Oréal, and Acushnet Company.[79][80]

Both the AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce support H.R. 3261, and many industries have also publicly praised the legislation. On September 22, 2011, a letter signed by over 350 businesses and organizations—including NBCUniversal, Pfizer, Ford Motor Company, Revlon, NBA, and Macmillan—was sent to Congress encouraging the passage of the legislation this year.[79][80] Fightonlinetheft.com, a website of The Coalition Against Counterfeiting and Piracy (a project of the United States Chamber of Commerce Global Intellectual Property Center[81]), cites a long list of supporters including these and the Fraternal Order of Police, the National Governors Association, the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the National Association of Attorneys General, the Better Business Bureau, and the National Consumers League.[82][83]

On November 22 the CEO of the Business Software Alliance (BSA) expressed concerns about the bill, saying that "valid and important questions have been raised about the bill". He said that definitions and remedies needed to be tightened and narrowed, but "BSA stands ready to work with Chairman Smith and his colleagues on the Judiciary Committee to resolve these issues."[84][85]

In June 2011, former Bill Clinton press secretary Mike McCurry and former George W. Bush advisor Mark McKinnon, business partners in Public Strategies, Inc., were in a campaign which echoed McCurry's earlier work in the network neutrality legislative fight. McCurry represented SOPA/Protect IP in Politico as a way to combat theft on-line,[86] drawing a favorable comment from the MPAA.[87] On the 15th, McCurry and Arts + Labs co-chair McKinnon sponsored the "CREATE -- A Forum on Creativity, Commerce, Copyright, Counterfeiting and Policy" conference with members of Congress, artists and information-business executives.[88]

Opposition

Politicians

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has expressed opposition to the bill, as well as Representatives Darrell Issa (R-CA) and presidential candidate Ron Paul (R-TX), who joined nine Democrats to sign a letter to other House members warning that the bill would cause "an explosion of innovation-killing lawsuits and litigation."[89] "Issa said the legislation is beyond repair and must be rewritten from scratch," reported The Hill.[90] Issa and Lofgren have announced plans for legislation offering "a copyright enforcement process modeled after the U.S. International Trade Commission's (ITC) patent infringement investigations."[42]

EFF home page with American Censorship Day banner
Organizations

Opponents of the bill include Google, Yahoo!, Facebook, Twitter, AOL, LinkedIn, eBay, Mozilla Corporation, the Brookings Institution, the Wikimedia Foundation,[91] and human rights organizations such as Reporters Without Borders,[92] the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the ACLU, and Human Rights Watch.[93][94]

On December 13, Julian Sanchez of the Libertarian think tank Cato Institute came out in strong opposition to the bill saying that while the amended version "trims or softens a few of the most egregious provisions of the original proposal...the fundamental problem with SOPA has never been these details; it’s the core idea. The core idea is still to create an Internet blacklist..."[95]

The Library Copyright Alliance (including the American Library Association) objects to the broadened definition of "willful infringement" and the introduction of felony penalties for noncommercial streaming infringement, stating that these changes could encourage criminal prosecution of libraries.[96]

On November 16, Tumblr, Mozilla, Techdirt, the Center for Democracy and Technology were among many other Internet companies that protested the Stop Online Piracy Act by participating in a so-called "American Censorship Day". They displayed black banners over their site logos with the words "STOP CENSORSHIP".[97] On November 22 Mike Masnick for Techdirt published a detailed criticism of the ideas underlying the bill, writing that "one could argue that the entire Internet enables or facilitates infringement", and saying that a list of sites compiled by the entertainment industry included the personal site of one of their own artists, 50 Cent, and a wide variety of highly successful legitimate internet companies. The article questioned the effect of the bill on $2 trillion in GDP and 3.1 million jobs, with a host of consequential problems on investment, liability, and innovation.[98][99]

The Center for Democracy and Technology maintains a list of SOPA and PIPA opponents consisting of the editorial boards of the New York Times and Los Angeles Times, 34 organizations, and many hundreds of prominent individuals.[100]

Other

In mid-November, Washington Post blogger Dominic Basulto, of Electric Artists and formerly Fortune and Corante.com,[101] drew parallels between SOPA and efforts by China, North Korea and Iran to limit internet access and saw an attempt "to push through new anti-piracy legislation by year-end that would benefit Hollywood at the expense of Silicon Valley".[102]

In December 2011, Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales initiated discussion with editors regarding a potential knowledge blackout, a protest inspired by a successful campaign by the Italian-language Wikipedia to block the Italian DDL intercettazioni bill, terms of which would have infringed the encyclopedia's editorial independence. Editors mulled interrupting service for one or more days as in the Italian protest, or alternatively presenting site visitors with a blanked page directing them to further information before permitting them to complete searches.[103][104][105][106]

Computer scientist Vint Cerf, one of the founders of the Internet and Google vice president, wrote House committee chairman Lamar Smith, saying "Requiring search engines to delete a domain name begins a worldwide arms race of unprecedented 'censorship' of the Web," in a letter published on CNet.[107][108]

The European Union Parliament has made a statement opposing the act, particulary in reference to the ability of the US to seize domain names.[109]

On December 15, 2011 a second hearing was scheduled to amend and vote on SOPA. Many opponents remain firm on their opposition to the act after Lamar Smith proposed a 71-page amendment to the bill to address previously raised concerns. NetCoalition, who works with Google, Twitter, eBay, and Facebook, appreciated that Lamar Smith is trying to address the issues with the bill, but says it nonetheless cannot support the amendment.[110] Darell Issa, a Republican who proposed an alternative to SOPA, stated that Smith’s amendment, “retains the fundamental flaws of its predecessor by blocking Americans' ability to access websites, imposing costly regulation on Web companies and giving Attorney General Eric Holder's Department of Justice broad new powers to police the Internet.”[110]