- Nov 23, 2012
- 1,723
- 94
- 178
Thank you Dany12, I will also have to go back to the video and listen more closely for the green peacock.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The drawing is a nice picture but nothing else. You cannot use it to compare birds. There are big differences between males and females especially when you look to the neck crests etc. It is just a nice drawing.
I know the background of the drawings. I never talk about many different sub-types and give them nice names. I never called me a scientist. I look on the drawings with all these sub-types and nice names. I can accept all this if I will have some real facts (pictures in a reasonable quality of different alive birds or skins) which are clear showing what we see on the drawings. As long as this is not presented all these nice drawings have nothing to do for me with scientific.The problem is that this is not a teenager drawing ... it is a scientific drawing!
In fact, the only place where they are talking about ... species, subspecies and even sub subspecies!
When scientists make a study in Laos or Cambodia for exemple, they only speak of green peacock ... NEVER subspecies!
If everyone ... lie a little bit ... forget a little bit .... transforms the truth a little bit ... where are we going ?