TheTwoRoos
Crowing
- Sep 25, 2015
- 4,368
- 2,039
- 316
Even getting them put to sleep,just an idea.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You really shouldn't throw them in the woods,they would likely just suffer out there,and also be killed,maybe even get caught and survive,but will not recover,just suffer.Culling or something would be better.
Even getting them put to sleep,just an idea.
Of course we're still friends, but I can not agree with this approach and will leave this topic aside between you and I! Onto other threads and happier timesEither way, humanly means nicer than not. They'd have a better chance in the woods then in my stomach, it would be humane for them, but not for me.
That's what I mean, even though I would hate to 'kill' them, not with my own hands. If I had to kill something like a bad person, I had no choice or doubt, BAM it's dead. if I had to kill a chicken, I had a choice. Unless it was deadly, my choice is no.
I am sorry we don't agree, still friends?![]()
As much as it was nasty, I rather not know if it dies. I had a hard time throwing that one in the woods. My Dad wanted to. He was the sweetest baby. But as time went on, he changed.
-The Angry Hen