Quote:
Of course we do. It's Intro to Biology, for non-science majors, at a community college. It's a mandatory course, why would the prof waste their time with what they know isn't gonna stick? I hate to be rude like that, but that's just the way it is. Even profs at OU and UCO that teach the same course use flippin' word banks on this type of class. Besides, they don't mark the papers. The machine does. There's no "fill in the blank" on a green Scan-Tron form.
Btw, I wouldn't recommend bothering to look at her word banks unless you already knew the words. Why? Because there's words from every chapter of the book in there to choose from, even though we're only testing over 4 chapters at a time. If you don't know the word from reading the definition, you might as well throw in the towel, because you were sunk.
Well, I agree they should have things like that exactly how your prof is doing it, but I just had never had a prof do it. I wish I did or do sometimes though, because seriously I might now the word but it escapes me under pressure and if I see it then it will trigger and be like oh yes that is it. Although, a trick I do use is looking at the rest of the test because sometimes there are hints to another problem in a different question.
Now it isn't necessarily like that in Math or Statistics, but when you are talking about history or science I have found a word or name I was trying to think of in another question. Some professors even do that on purpose.
ETA: Have you ever had a question on a test where you read the whole question, but then at the end or maybe the beginning it says do not answer this question, but otherwise they have it set up for you to answer it. I just heard about this the other day. I have never experienced it myself, but a guy at the store was telling me about it the other day. He said it is some sort of new technique to test your paying attention to detail skills or something. Still kind of strikes me as odd, but hey I wouldn't mind having a freebie.