What a great thread!
In spite of the location in my profile, I am not a city-slicker (well, until recently). I am a professional wild-life artist and I have to say it is so funny to hear everyone analyzing the angles and such (which we artists would call POV), which is something I do for a living. Actually, I think the OP did a fairly good job taking the two pics from the same distance away and almost the same height, it just looks like the game cam was set up slightly crooked.
When I broke out my mad Photoshopping skills (
) and started playing with layers, opacity, and rotating, I found the two images lined up fairly well. Here is an image where I lined up the landmarks of the chair, tree, rocks and such and then played with filters and opacity so you can see both images (sort of). I really did get everything to line up just about exactly - chair, reeds, rocks in the pond, fence, etc.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I'd be scared if domestic kitties that size were running around!
I won't hazard an I.D., but I'll let the rest of you come to your own conclusions.
Just a note from someone who has done animal animations. There is something we call the "squash and stretch." It is amazing how small and chunky a large lean animal can look when it is crouched or or bunched up. Here is a reference I use for my illustration students, by the famous animal animator, Hultgren. I don't have his cat one readily available on my computer, but this one gives you the idea.