Solved Problem Adding Enough Photos to Article

[feathermaid]

Ok, we're going to try a test...

I've bumped up the limit to 200 pics for articles. While I stick by my statement here (that articles with that many pics can start to get a little unruly), I don't see a tremendous harm in testing what happens if we allow more.

So, upload to your heart's content

Wow! That's a huge bump!

Thank you for doing that ...

Sorry for being such a pest.

 

[feathermaid]

I too am not a fan of having to scroll through a million pictures. It gets too messy with a lot of pics.
10 ish is great.
50 is nuts.
IMO.

True.
I might try to narrow it down a bit.

 

[Kiki]

True.
I might try to narrow it down a bit.

I think that would be a good idea but it's not my article.

 

[Nifty-Chicken]

Also, for people on slow connections / phones, it's harder to load a ton of pics on a big page, so I'd still suggest that you create an album in the gallery, and link to it from your article for peeps that want to look through 50+ pics.

 

[casportpony]

I think it will load faster if all pictures are loaded as thumbnails.

 

[feathermaid]

I think it will load faster if all pictures are loaded as thumbnails.

I was just doing that now. Only some I'm keeping big.
We'll see how it looks in the end...
Somehow this isn't as fun as it used to be

I think mostly I wanted to make the article as a tutorial for people looking for lots of details.
Like when I was doing coop research on how to build one, I was usually disappointed there wasn't enough detailed instruction of what worked and what didn't.
So I'm making my article super descriptive I guess.