Oh Karen, I'm so sorry about your little rooster.
What a terrible choice to have to make. I feel you did right by him, but I'm sorry that it happened.
I spent most of the morning researching and I feel like I'm even more clueless than when I started. I had been led to believe that PCR was the end-all test for this and now I am not so sure. Did you know there are different PCR testing methods? I didn't. I am again feeling like I chose the wrong career...!
From this page, which I just found today for the first time: http://www.aaap.info/frequently-asked-questions-on-viral-tumor-diseases
Regarding the various tests listed in your book for diagnosing Marek's, I suspect that it was pointing to the fact that any one test by itself may not be enough to pinpoint Marek's as the sole infection-- active or latent.
I feel like I will need to take a few hours this week and re-write parts of my FAQ......

I spent most of the morning researching and I feel like I'm even more clueless than when I started. I had been led to believe that PCR was the end-all test for this and now I am not so sure. Did you know there are different PCR testing methods? I didn't. I am again feeling like I chose the wrong career...!
From this page, which I just found today for the first time: http://www.aaap.info/frequently-asked-questions-on-viral-tumor-diseases
In positive cases: A positive PCR result means the DNA of the specified pathogen was found within the provided sample type. In most cases this means the pathogen is likely the cause of disease as well. However, PCR can not differentiate between live and dead organisms, and a few pathogens are carried by hosts without necessarily causing disease like symptoms (Equine Herpesvirus-2 and EHV-5 are good examples). Based on clinical signs and symptoms, it is at the discretion of the veterinarian to decide if the pathogen is the cause of disease. Please see question # 13 in regards to vaccine detection.
In negative cases: A negative PCR result can mean a number of things: 1.) no infection, 2.) the sample provided is free of the pathogen(s) requested, 3.) the pathogen(s) may be present, but at a quantity below our assays’ detection limit (about 2-10 copies of a gene), 4.) the pathogen is a rare mutation that is not detected by our current PCR assays.
Regarding the various tests listed in your book for diagnosing Marek's, I suspect that it was pointing to the fact that any one test by itself may not be enough to pinpoint Marek's as the sole infection-- active or latent.
I feel like I will need to take a few hours this week and re-write parts of my FAQ......
Last edited: