Question on GMO feed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote: Opinions should be based on FACTS
Go back and see who's doing the name calling and juvenile ramblings, and who is presenting credible data
 
You posted a somewhat accurate flow chart of the corporate food industry.
BTW this is the first mostly accurate information that I have seen.
To what purpose is this chart poster here except to rue the fact that none of the companies shown have the words "Peoples Socialists Revolutionary Commune, Committee, Factory or Collective Farm" in their names?
 
Last edited:
I hope you're kidding.....or you have no sense of humor.
No nan4848, if you will only read my posts on almost any subject you will find a well developed if not some what wry or dry sense of humor.
wink.png


However if I had posted a picture of say a hot kitchen stove with the you know what message about a woman's place, the shoe would have rightfully been on the other foot and I would now stand before you condemed.

What law of good breeding allows this kind of thing to go on in a civilized society? Sadly the poster's puppy must have eaten her charm school homework the day they lectured about good manners and threatening people who disagree with you with a picture of a firearm
somad.gif
. Who does she think she is anyway, Squeaky Fromme?
 
Last edited:
Opinions should be based on FACTS
Go back and see who's doing the name calling and juvenile ramblings, and who is presenting credible data

Oh...I see!! Your data is credible but the other side is all propaganda?? Based on what??? That your info comes from the government? That is laughable that you put that much faith in anyone but yourself!!

I have to say that you're doing your fair share, too!
 
It always gets to me when someone says a judge or someone rules a certain way because they're in someones pockets. But I guess it's easier behind the safety of a keyboard.

Hey, I don't need to hide behind the safety of a keyboard!! It is a legitimate question and I wouldn't be afraid to say if face to face, so don't assume you know me. It surely wouldn't be the first time and the old adage "money talks" is still alive and kicking even more so in this age!!!

Besides, why would a jury rule for the plaintiffs and then it's appealed and a judge rules for the defendant!?! Legitimate question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom