LOL
More of the same old hysteria and misdirection
Still no PROVEN harmful effects under NORMAL exposure conditons.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL
Ah, but is modified ingredients in EVERYTHING moderate exposure???????? Who knows. If you want me to buy your product, tell me what's in it, don't give me the FDA or USDA says it's not harmful. My only choice now is to avoid it all.LOL
More of the same old hysteria and misdirection
Still no PROVEN harmful effects under NORMAL exposure conditons.
Well, thanks for sharing. A potato is really the least thing in my mind, there was so much more and it convinces me to support “non-GMO”. I don’t understand why anyone would want GMO in their diet, but that’s fine, you are set on your opinion and, so what! I have mine too, we presented our cases and they differ widely, too bad. Going “back and forth” won’t help anything. At least you now have your studies which you said didn’t exist. The worst that can happen is you falsely convincing others that GMO is fine and making it harder for the rest of us to get away from it being in our food, and most importantly for me, our seeds. But will that really happen anyway? Maybe.My thoughts are this is the normal vague MISinformation that most anti GMO sites use.
They started out with at totally irrational statement which showed their obvious bias, and then
they presented lots of HEARSAY, with no evidence to prove the claims.
A little research shows a different result than the site claims and that his conclusions were largely based on tests that only lasted 10 days
Here's what his own colleagues had to say about it::
http://www.mindfully.org/GE/Arpad-Pusztai-Potato.htm
LOL
More of the same old hysteria and misdirection
Still no PROVEN harmful effects under NORMAL exposure conditons.
Well, I disagree on that one...big time! But oh well. Because the study goes against what you want to believe doesn't make it useless. More than one was done, different types. And I'm not convinced they were refuted. And even things that weren't meant as studies prove it harmful. If you read through the material, you see what happened to one man doing research, yea, fired, material confiscated and gag order. Why would others want to risk going through the same thing. They don't.A worthless study might as well not exist, since it serves no real purpose.
The ones cited in your links were refuted
Quote:
Well we are eating GMO's that are poison, you say, and our diet is killing us, you say. But people are living longer then ever before. Hmmmmmmm....
Millions of people and animals have been eating it for decades, and NO ONE has ever proven it's caused any harm.
When asked for proof, the same old studies from the same old "scientists" are drug up and offered, even though they have been shown to be flawed
If you don't want to eat GMO's, then don't. It's your choice
But saying it's because it's harmful is simply not true.