Ok, have to point something out here. While the pictures are a bit disappointing for those of us who have either defended her or were at least reserving judgement because something didn't seem right, they are still being published via the media. We have no idea who took those pictures, when they were taken, and if they are in fact of her barn. If they are from her barn during the seizure, who released them? I find it highly doubtful that the media would have been able to take those pictures simply because they would have been in the way. If "they" are releasing evidence before her court appearance then they are violating her rights. These pictures if taken by authorities would be evidence and should be sealed until the court date. They're not looking for a suspect or a missing rabbit, there is no reason for them to release them.
If the pictures were taken by the house rabbit society, can you trust that they are legitimate?
I'm not defending, I'm just saying don't be quick to rush to judgement because it just seems strange. The whole situation seems highly questionable and I, for one, do not trust the media at face value.
If the pictures were taken by the house rabbit society, can you trust that they are legitimate?
I'm not defending, I'm just saying don't be quick to rush to judgement because it just seems strange. The whole situation seems highly questionable and I, for one, do not trust the media at face value.