Ribh's D'Coopage

Thank you :)... he’s a fatty :lol:
Sad news... I am officially allergic to my cats :hit.. I was testing things out just to be sure and today I was holding... and kissing Pippin.. and I got it bad :(... my eyes start to itch.. REALLY BAD!! And from the kissing my lips itch :mad:... one eye turns blood red and gets these weird bubbles of water on my eyeball :confused:... I guess that could be the result of trying to scratch my eyes out :rolleyes:

I guess I’ll just look at them from a distance :(..... yea right!
I'm allergic to mine as well. I just have to remember not to touch my eyes after handling them ~ or to stick my face in their fur. More to the point, keep them from shoving their fur in my face. :)
 
:) BTW, how are you finding Middlemarch?

The writing is astonishingly accomplished in that a reader has to surrender to its rhythm. It whispers "pay attention or you'll have to read me again because you know I've got secrets on every page," by which I mean the book's vibrancy is in what the characters express in posture, glance, and what they choose to not say. The characters interpret each other without words, so I have to too. This form of characterisation and story-telling invites me to be thoughtful as I proceed, to pause now and then and ponder. Best of all, it's executed with a delicacy that respects my authority over my own perceptions - a very rare treat these days when so many novels yell at us.

In terms of plot, it's of its time, as all gracefully-aged novels are, but its themes are present in the here and now.

So it's very satisfying and its teaching me to consider and expand my mind as I read - a perfect antidote in a time when so much of what we encounter clamours for our attention and presents nothing beyond the superficial.

Yikes, I just reread all that and realised I've come across like ... A w****r! Oh well, at least I'm aware of it...
 
The writing is astonishingly accomplished in that a reader has to surrender to its rhythm. It whispers "pay attention or you'll have to read me again because you know I've got secrets on every page," by which I mean the book's vibrancy is in what the characters express in posture, glance, and what they choose to not say. The characters interpret each other without words, so I have to too. This form of characterisation and story-telling invites me to be thoughtful as I proceed, to pause now and then and ponder. Best of all, it's executed with a delicacy that respects my authority over my own perceptions - a very rare treat these days when so many novels yell at us.

In terms of plot, it's of its time, as all gracefully-aged novels are, but its themes are present in the here and now.

So it's very satisfying and its teaching me to consider and expand my mind as I read - a perfect antidote in a time when so much of what we encounter clamours for our attention and presents nothing beyond the superficial.

Yikes, I just reread all that and realised I've come across like ... A w****r! Oh well, at least I'm aware of it...
:lau It's all good. I majored in Language & Literature @ uni so you sound astonishingly normal to me! :gigIt's a period I choose not to read in as I find most of this era's novelists frustrating & wordy but I may just have to try Middlemarch. Really good books are hard to find. I like beautiful writing, preferably very concise :lol:, & most modernists drive me crazy. They sound like a bad local rag. I was spoilt by Rumor Godden when I was very young & very few novelists are capable of saying so much with so few words!
 
I wouldn't call it concise and the right argument might persuade me to call it wordy. But I'm nailing my colours to the mast: I like it because it neither spoon-feeds me nor does it clamour for my attention. I like it because I feel respected by its author.

Lots of today's books make me feel like a data point on a sales chart and that's something I rebel against.
 
I wouldn't call it concise and the right argument might persuade me to call it wordy. But I'm nailing my colours to the mast: I like it because it neither spoon-feeds me nor does it clamour for my attention. I like it because I feel respected by its author.

Lots of today's books make me feel like a data point on a sales chart and that's something I rebel against.
Which is probably why I read so little *modern* stuff. I moved to really obscure archaeology from fantasy & my local librarian would quail each & every time I requested an interlibrary loan form ~ especially because I would even have the IBN number!:lau They've changed our librarian [she's a mainlander now] & I don't borrow the way I used to. My eyes get tired fast these days & the LP books are rather too bulky for slipping in my handbag to read on the boat. :(
 
Thank you :)... he’s a fatty :lol:
Sad news... I am officially allergic to my cats :hit.. I was testing things out just to be sure and today I was holding... and kissing Pippin.. and I got it bad :(... my eyes start to itch.. REALLY BAD!! And from the kissing my lips itch :mad:... one eye turns blood red and gets these weird bubbles of water on my eyeball :confused:... I guess that could be the result of trying to scratch my eyes out :rolleyes:

I guess I’ll just look at them from a distance :(..... yea right!

I'm sorry. That's awful. I have to have my cats. They are my besties, next to Maleficent of course!
 
Which is probably why I read so little *modern* stuff. I moved to really obscure archaeology from fantasy & my local librarian would quail each & every time I requested an interlibrary loan form ~ especially because I would even have the IBN number!:lau They've changed our librarian [she's a mainlander now] & I don't borrow the way I used to. My eyes get tired fast these days & the LP books are rather too bulky for slipping in my handbag to read on the boat. :(

Do you like audiobooks Ribh? The only ones I don't like are the ones read by people who over-interpret the text in forming their approach to expression. If a book is read aloud with a light interpretive touch, I rather enjoy it.
 
Do you like audiobooks Ribh? The only ones I don't like are the ones read by people who over-interpret the text in forming their approach to expression. If a book is read aloud with a light interpretive touch, I rather enjoy it.
Do you like audiobooks Ribh? The only ones I don't like are the ones read by people who over-interpret the text in forming their approach to expression. If a book is read aloud with a light interpretive touch, I rather enjoy it.
I'm not a fan. I'm a really fast reader & audio is too slow for me ~ plus I did theatre as my minor ~ makes me really difficult to please. It's also really hard to reread [rehear?] a passage that pleases me or to mark things I may want to reference later. Yep. I'm one of those terrible people who scribbles things in the margins of her books!:lol: That too is from childhood. I read Antonia Forest, who like Sayers & Eliot & Shakespeare before her, quotes everybody who was ever anybody in Literature anywhere & I'd never heard of them so I looked them up & wrote the info in the margins as a helpful reminder. There's an American called Pamela Dean who does the same thing & I am still finding great quotes from people I've never heard of.:lau No such thing as being too educated. I sometimes wonder why I got a degree. It merely reveals the depth of my ignorance.:gig
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom