- Thread starter
- #31
Quote:
It is quite possible that the chickens Saylor found were feral games. It is a proven fact that, during WWII, Japanese soldiers introduced a lot of different breeds of chicken to the islands they captured, and during their occupation of Saipan, they probably released their Shamos and other game breeds. These purebreds (theoretically) interbred with either native chickens or other imported chickens, and overtime the Saipan Jungle Fowl began to take on certain unique characteristics. I do not believe that Saipans are merely feral games, in the sense of the word. Saipans themselves are not completely game, and males can get along with each other, provided there is a good deal of space. Either the lack of selective breeding on Saipan eliminated the gameyness of the Saipans ancestors, or the Saipan is a result of games crossing with non-games.
Another theory (promoted by Saylor himself) says that Saipans began as ancient breeds brought to the island by Polynesian natives. When the Japanese imported their chickens, the native Saipanese fowl interbred with them, and the Saipan Jungle Fowl was born. This theory could also be plausible, as Oriental games are very old breeds and could've been bred by Polynesians, but it is really impossible to tell.
I think the lack of exact information on Saipanese fowl is the reason why there is a bit of controversy on their origin. They're not like the Asil, which can be found in ancient Indian documents from 3,000 years ago. Basically, Saipanese fowl could have originated in almost any way.
It is quite possible that the chickens Saylor found were feral games. It is a proven fact that, during WWII, Japanese soldiers introduced a lot of different breeds of chicken to the islands they captured, and during their occupation of Saipan, they probably released their Shamos and other game breeds. These purebreds (theoretically) interbred with either native chickens or other imported chickens, and overtime the Saipan Jungle Fowl began to take on certain unique characteristics. I do not believe that Saipans are merely feral games, in the sense of the word. Saipans themselves are not completely game, and males can get along with each other, provided there is a good deal of space. Either the lack of selective breeding on Saipan eliminated the gameyness of the Saipans ancestors, or the Saipan is a result of games crossing with non-games.
Another theory (promoted by Saylor himself) says that Saipans began as ancient breeds brought to the island by Polynesian natives. When the Japanese imported their chickens, the native Saipanese fowl interbred with them, and the Saipan Jungle Fowl was born. This theory could also be plausible, as Oriental games are very old breeds and could've been bred by Polynesians, but it is really impossible to tell.
I think the lack of exact information on Saipanese fowl is the reason why there is a bit of controversy on their origin. They're not like the Asil, which can be found in ancient Indian documents from 3,000 years ago. Basically, Saipanese fowl could have originated in almost any way.
