Oh my. not a fun thing I know. Sorry to hear that, work on it
Every once in a while I pick up a tidbit here and there on this thread. I have a gorgeous porcelain (project) silkie...too young to sex. I have a lavender and 2 buff silkies (potential show quality)...all still young, but I'm leaning towards pullets. I am hoping the porcelain is a roo.
When I think of ''silkie''porcelain/self blue apricot I think of a melanized buff columbian- Golden lakenvelder/vorkwerk) 2 does lavender. Frankly to be honest it never dawned on me until last winter that is what they are (for me) when I started another project using them which a great man has
already accomplished overseas, just not in a silkie. so this is what I see. take a look at the ones that are actually right (silkies porc/SBA's) and put the color back in black head, hackles, primaries, tail and add buff to the rest.
I don't claim to be an expert in genetics. I try only to speak on what I know as far as actual results for me.
Also, as far as the genetics issue, does this porcelain translate to other breeds? By using the same color cross breeding?
Silkie porcelain is not as described in the poultry standard for the variety.
For me I see a true porcelain on a silkie being a muddy looking bird. Take a look a silkie partridge. Where do you see pencilling on them? where ever you have feather barbing. shoulders, wings foot feathers, etc.
The actual color is not easy to maintain on a hard feathered bird for exhibition mix in shredding and how is one to judge or determine actual proper placement of the Flowering/motts?
Being an artisit, I try and imagine it visually. messy. And I think actually it had been tried by some breeders and the result was that they were muddy.
Again its just my opinion...... I mean no disrespect to readers

Do you have a link or photos?