THIS. This is something I just cannot wrap my head around either. When I started to realize that I had more than one cockerel and that keeping
chickens -- roosters included -- and not just hens, was a whole different ball game, I started reading several of the threads in the Chicken Behaviors forum about roosters in particular. Some of the prevailing attitudes really surprised me in their disparagement for every quality I would expect in a feral animal known for his protective role and fighting abilities.
Now, I know a lot of these people have a lot more time and experience than I do with chicken keeping. And evidently a lot more experience killing roosters who so much "look at them the wrong way." What on earth does that even mean? I've even read a thread where a very long time chicken keeper mentioned that "culling" (killing, people, just say it, it's ok) roosters who behaved in ways "unacceptable" -- like in one case, being too close to the person's shoe taking a photograph -- was perhaps a way to encourage more gentle/tame/domesticated traits to be passed along. (!)
I had to stop reading and take a deep breath. A Personalized Rooster Eugenics program for your backyard flock! Oh. My. Goodness. First of all, this attitude assumes that humans will always be here, at the "top of the food chain", with all the other animals beneath us, grovelling and suffering in zoos and pens and factories, imprisoned in conservation areas. Whereas right now, in this Anthopocene we've created, all the evidence is pointing the way down for this hyper civilized hell on earth. And that we have the right and the power to "make" other living beings whatever we want them to be. Emasculated, dandified wimps who can't look after their tribes when the remnants of humanity are back in survival mode. And I think this really sucks.
Recently I had to travel to Quito, the capital city, to ship a box of cacao products to Canada. I was gone for nearly 3 days. The morning after I returned, I went out very early to hang up some wash. The chickens were just walking over from the coop to be fed. Lucio saw me and flew at me, spurs out. He had shown some impatience before when the feeding group got too large to herd effectively, but this was a full on attack (the first of it's kind). It was like he'd never seen me before. I snapped a wet shirt at him to deflect his blow and said, "Whoa buddy! What the heck?" As soon as he heard my voice, he blinked, registered who I was, and started gabbling in a clearly apologetic way.
I learned a lesson. Not a huge deal. If I go away for a few days, always use my voice to communicate that I'm back before just popping up. And come on. I know they look fierce and all, but he's an eight pound bird. I'm a very petite woman, but even I can handle him. I'm still a lot bigger and stronger. Yes, he can probably inflict damage like a cut or bruise. But he saw an "invader" and did his job. What is so wrong about that? He has the makings of a very good rooster. He is very very good with his hens. As long as he knows who I am, he respects me as well. But I'm not going to justify why I will most definitely keep him, despite the brush up last week, because I shouldn't have to. He's a rooster.
If I posted this story on another forum here, I can just hear the chorus of tired old "freezer camp" tropes. In my very heartfelt and humble opinion, a rooster is not a pet, nor should he be attempted to be molded into a pet. Neither is a hen, really. But a rooster's function, from long before post industrialized technocratic soft bodied control drama thinking humans colonized this planet, is to propagate his genes and protect the ones who bear and care for his progeny. That's it. What is so hard to understand about that?
I just look at him and all the wonderful pictures of roosters you all have shared and think, my gods, what magnificent animals. How perfectly evolved for their role. Why would anyone want to ruin that?
(Phew. Deep breath. End rant. Please don't report me to the freezer camp crowd.)
View attachment 3596940
View attachment 3596941
View attachment 3596943