Shocking Food Industry Secrets

Russian research says genetically modified foods are harmful


Russia has started the annual Days of Defence against Environmental Hazards from the 15th of April to the 5th of June 2010, with the announcement of sensational results of an independent work of research. Scientists have proved that Genetically Modified Organisms are harmful for mammals. The researchers discovered that animals that eat GM foodstuffs lose their ability to reproduce. Campbell hamsters that have a fast reproduction rate were fed for two years with ordinary soya beans, which are widely used in agriculture and those contain different percentages of GM organisms. Another group of hamsters, the control group, was fed with pure soya, which was found with great difficulty in Serbia because 95 percent of soya in the world is transgenic.

Concerning the experiment carried out jointly by the National Association for Gene Security and the Institute of Ecological and Evolutional Problems, Dr. Alexei Surov has this to say. “We selected several groups of hamsters, kept them in pairs in cells and gave them ordinary food as always,” says Alexei Surov. “We did not add anything for one group but the other was fed with soya that contained no GM components, while the third group with some content of Genetically Modified Organisms and the fourth one with increased amount of GMO. We monitored their behavior and how they gain weight and when they give birth to their cubs. Originally, everything went smoothly. However, we noticed quite a serious effect when we selected new pairs from their cubs and continued to feed them as before. These pairs’ growth rate was slower and reached their sexual maturity slowly. When we got some of their cubs we formed the new pairs of the third generation. We failed to get cubs from these pairs, which were fed with GM foodstuffs. It was proved that these pairs lost their ability to give birth to their cubs,” Dr. Alexei Surov said.

Another surprise was discovered by scientists in hamsters of the third generation. Hair grew in the mouth of the animals that took part in the experiment. It’s unclear why this happened. The researchers cannot understand why a programme of destruction is launched when animals take GMO foodstuffs. They say that this can be neutralized only by stopping to eat these foods. Consequently, scientists suggest imposing a ban on the use of GM foods until they are tested for their bio-security. The results of Russian scientists coincide with those of their colleagues from France and Austria. For one, when scientist proved that GM maize was harmful for mammals, France banned immediately its production and sale. The scientists who carried out the experiment say that it’s too early to make far-reaching conclusions about the health hazards of the GMO. They insist that there is a need to carry out comprehensive research. They suggest implementing the project, “Safety Gene Technology” at the innovation centre, “Skolkovo” which is being set up near Moscow.
 
We don't have a problem with 14 in the UK most supermarkets moved sweets away from the checkouts Morrisons have them but Sainsburys, and tesco's don't. AS for the big agrochemical firms they have a bad habit of finding local products in poorer countries and patenting them when they are not new and they didn't create them
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/745028.stm
The European Patent Office has revoked a patent granted six years ago on an anti-fungal product, which uses seeds from the neem tree grown widely in India.

Campaigners are heralding it as a victory in the fight to stop big business exploiting plants and genes at the expense of poor people in the developing world.

The neem tree has been used for centuries as a medicine, insecticide and contraceptive.

Pressure groups hope the move signals that it will be harder in the future for multinational companies to patent plants and genes.

Challenge

Six years ago the European Patent Office granted a patent to the US Department of Agriculture and multinational agriculture company W R Grace.

It covered a method of using the neem tree oil for fungicidal purposes.

neem saplings
Young neems awaiting planting
Subsequently, the granting of the patent was challenged by Green party politicans in the European Parliament and other pressure groups.

They oppose big business owning the rights to living organisms - what they call biopiracy - because they say the livelihoods of poor farmers in developing countries will be undermined.

At a hearing in Munich this week, the manager of an Indian agriculture company proved that he had been using an extract of neem tree oil for the same purpose as described in the patent several years before it was filed.

For this reason the EPO said the method couldn't be patented.

The decision was hailed by non- governmental organisations as a signal to companies and governments in rich countries that the developing world is going to challenge this type of patent.

Pressure

Many plants have already been patented - mainly in the US.

Around 70 patents have been taken out on products from the neem tree alone.

Genes from nutmeg and camphor have also been patented with the aim of producing their oils artificially - a move which would hit producers in developing countries.

Now a new European directive allowing patents on genetic resources is on the cards.

Already governments in Germany, Italy and the Netherlands have refused to support it.

Pressure groups want the British government to join the opposition and hope the latest decision on the neem tree patent will encourage them to do so.
 
It's unreal, the amount of tampering, dissecting, hydrogenating, iodizing, ect. It just isn't needed, eat a dang apple. Corporations pride themselves in providing a much needed service and benefits of convenience to the mass. So they say, anyways. The whole point really is to make as much money as they possibly can, in a war like method of influence, bribery, bullying, let no one stand in their way. They have so much money, from branching out in so many directions, it's easy to lose sight and focus on expanding, growing, more and more money. I haven't figured out the appeal of chemicals yet. Chemical companies claiming how safe they are? Money? Feeling superior for mastering the technology?

If you look into the mind of people with a lot of power... it starts to make sense. No matter who you are, you will have an ego, some greed, some envy, all those vices. Some people don't have that. But people who have a lot of compassion, a true love of people, who wants to do right... you won't find them in charge of anything major. They're not hungry enough to reach that high. Who is hungry for that power? What will they do with it? Will they play it like a role playing game of sorts, happily sitting in their chair watching it all play out as planned? We don't know what goes on behind closed doors. The backside of politics that never reaches the news. If you don't play by the rules and do what the others do, someone will black mail you, tell your secrets, or resort to false propaganda to try and get you out. Every time a giant scandal breaks... you have to wonder... who told on them? And why? They never say. Who tipped off the reporter? What was the real reason behind it, what sort of power play? And of course all the people are clamoring for their resignation, and the scheme worked with complete public support. Likely it isn't always a scheme. But look at human nature, look at the true nature of politics, the influence of money, and the types of people who end up in power house positions and what sort of minions they have on hand to do their bidding.

You know if you have an invention... and it's completely stupid and useless, falsely advertised... think of the old medical things. Like the x-ray machine they put in shoe stores a LONG time ago when xray technology first came out and they didn't know how harmful it was. You put on the pair of shoes you like, place your feet inside, and look through a viewer to see what your toes look like, in xray, in the shoe. Made the inventor a rich man even though it was a failed invention because of the health concerns. Likely he didn't know the harms at all.

So with that in mind, what sort of technologies are we developing, that people are expanding on as their "next big idea"... that are actually harmful in ways not known yet? Motivated by making a million or more... who has time to wait out proper testing and waiting out to see what is wrong with it... when they have this grand idea right now?

There was a problem with rice drowning and the plants dying from excess rain, to the tune of some 30 million people being without their rice when that happened. So a US company takes it upon itself to genetically modify rice to make a species that can be submerged, and survive, for weeks. Normal rice, needs to be unsubmerged in 3 days. The new stuff, could be under water for 2 weeks. When they presented this new rice, they couldn't convince the populace to use it. Too skeptical. So they passed along the varieties they used in the development to a local firm (in India?) who did it the old fashioned way through cross pollination. So they didn't even need to genetically engineer anything, simple cross pollination worked just fine and the people got their new rice.

But try telling a scientist that what they're so deeply passionate about could be harmful. Then tell the corporations who can profit big time off of the ideas of "little people" that it is wrong. Think of it this way, if you have the winning $270,000,000 lottery ticket in your pocket, what would you do to protect it? What if someone got in your way of cashing it in? What lengths would you go through to ensure you got your money? What if that ticket was in the billions, and you could get it all in less than 2 years time?

Then, look at all the technology for green energy. Some REALLY good ideas. Then look at who holds the patents and rights to these new, unproduced, technologies. Many are in the hands of big oil companies. The first truly electric car was designed years ago and bought up quickly and quietly by one of our beloved car companies. YEARS ago. It's only just now come out with it's own version, at the prime time for such a thing to make a lot of money, potentially.

Food is a basic need for humans. Who ever holds the food has the power. Do you have any idea how much food the US has stored? I don't have a number. But we have plenty stock piled. Seed banks too, in case something wipes out the crops on a mass scale, we have back up. Government can be the hero by providing it. But who provided the seeds? Who's corn is it? Who won that contract in backdoor politics? Are they regular unaltered seeds? Genetically modified to grow in bad conditions?

You know they're out there buying up water sources right now. Water is just as important as food. With the water shortages being predicted out west... that's a lot of water that's going to need collected, stored, transported, and SOLD for big money. See a need, predict the needs, prepare, and get in and make some big money. Use fear to create needs. Use fear to drive prices. Use underhanded methods to push out the nice guy and grow your profits. Eliminate the competition by just buying them out. Use your money to sway things to your benefit. Play the game to win.

When you buy something, think about what industry you are supporting. Where you buy it, think of who you're supporting. It's so inconvenient to read labels. Takes so much time to think about each choice. Too much research. We're too lazy as a whole. There are 300,000,000 people in the US. So many of them don't pay attention to what they're buying from who. But if enough care, they would change something and the market would have to adjust.

Markets work because people buy things. To make money, you have to follow the trends of the market and predict the needs. Lot's of companies betting on our poor choices and need of convenience. Food is one of those. It's so easy to throw a pre-made dish into the microwave. Now, how can we make that product cheaper to produce. How can we market it to make more people buy it.

What trends will we start and what trends will we end? You can't eliminate corruption. It's impossible. But consumers and the population as a whole sway things, since consumers drive the whole process. If no one is consuming your product, you're not making any money. So who are you going to support with what you eat, drink, or buy in general?
 
Both excellent and informative posts
thumbsup.gif

Yup follow the money and you will have your answer to why crazy stuff like this is happening.

I use Neem in my natural fly spray for the horses, works fantastic and I buy Neem Toothpaste. Ever since I have been using Neem tothpaste I haven't had any cavities..........
idunno.gif
It is a all natural toothaste and doesn't contain flouride.

Some shocking news from Canada, it is ridiculous banning these natural health products.
http://canadianawarenessnetwork.blogspot.com/2011/01/bee-pollen-cinnamon-and-many-other-nhps.html

Another report that shows GMO is destroying the beneficial enzyemes in the soil. Making it dead soil.
http://www.wellnessuncovered.com/jo...oil&catid=34:articles-on-gmo-safety&Itemid=15
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom