- Thread starter
- #3,701
Last update for today from the DA's office:
The writ was for State vs. Man Who Leased Horse, so the writ wasn't technically including the uncle. They are rewriting it and going back over old evidence and will be going after where Max was stated to be at by 2 people. The writ will be done against that person. A warrant can't be issued for the uncle because he claimed that Max was not on his property, not that he gave Max away. He claimed the same thing IN the hearing, so a warrant can't be issued for him, but for the other person, it's a possibility, especially if anything happens.
They are tracking down info now on the third person involved and we will hopefully hear something around 11:00AM or later tomorrow.
Believe me, I've been using worse names in my head and around the house.
If you want specific information, feel free to PM.
The writ was for State vs. Man Who Leased Horse, so the writ wasn't technically including the uncle. They are rewriting it and going back over old evidence and will be going after where Max was stated to be at by 2 people. The writ will be done against that person. A warrant can't be issued for the uncle because he claimed that Max was not on his property, not that he gave Max away. He claimed the same thing IN the hearing, so a warrant can't be issued for him, but for the other person, it's a possibility, especially if anything happens.
They are tracking down info now on the third person involved and we will hopefully hear something around 11:00AM or later tomorrow.
Believe me, I've been using worse names in my head and around the house.
If you want specific information, feel free to PM.