- Apr 25, 2015
- 4,657
- 3,311
- 407
Here was the proposal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In North Dakota there are very few people NPIP certified, in fact I don't know if there are two people who are. There has not been an outbreak in 50 years, and honestly the state didn't realize birds needed to be tested to show until about 10 years ago therr was never a problem, and I can gurantee some counties still do not test. Many states have waived testing for shows under different bylaws, or have taken some action and some of those states include states with a large commercial poultry population.
So yes I was all for waiving it for a couple months, otherwise many people including myself would not be able to show. Currently it was an estimated 1004 birds were not tested, that was without 10 counties reporting numbers, so we would have almost no birds shown. Also because unlike someone who lives in Minnesota we would have to pay on the low side $65 per bird to have a serology test done, because I live farther west my test per bird would actually be around the $135 range. I was either not going to show along with almost everyone else in the state or I was going to push to get this waived.
Seeing as no one opposed including the 5 or more veterinarians in the room, and a representative from the Game and Fish I would say everyone is fine with it.