Announcement The Coop Page / Article Rating & Review Project!

[MROO]

@KikisGirls
Hi Kiki - You may want to check out the "Rooster Ridge" coop article, too. It's a great pic of a great run, but not an article. It would be better in a coop gallery, not as an article.

 

[MROO]

Let's all get busy rating guys!

A question for the Great and Powerful Oz and his Manic Minions ...

I have come across several really nice coop "articles" that are just pictures with little (or sometimes no) text at all. They are really nice coops and runs that deserve to be seen. They offer some good ideas to those of us who are always looking for upgrades, but they really don't qualify as "articles." They are much better suited for the Gallery Section, under "Coops."

Is there a way to flag those for you admin-types without having to send an individual link for each one? Or should we just continue to review them as articles?

 

[Kiki]

A question for the Great and Powerful Oz and his Manic Minions ...

I have come across several really nice coop "articles" that are just pictures with little (or sometimes no) text at all. They are really nice coops and runs that deserve to be seen. They offer some good ideas to those of us who are always looking for upgrades, but they really don't qualify as "articles." They are much better suited for the Gallery Section, under "Coops."

Is there a way to flag those for you admin-types without having to send an individual link for each one? Or should we just continue to review them as articles?

I say...continue to review them.

 

[Kiki]

Hopefully all future articles will be created with more than just a few photos.


Hint hint.

 

[Abriana]

I got alerts saying that I have 5 page ratings (also 1 and 10) is this what it means? But I don’t have a coop page.

 

[Nifty-Chicken]

They are really nice coops and runs that deserve to be seen. They offer some good ideas to those of us who are always looking for upgrades, but they really don't qualify as "articles." They are much better suited for the Gallery Section, under "Coops."

Or should we just continue to review them as articles?

Great questions!!!

IMO, since they still can provide helpful value / information (pics worth 1,000 words?), then my vote is to leave them in the coops section... but maybe rate them accordingly.

For example, if a page only has a handful of nice "completed coop" pics, but zero pictures during construction and no text, I tend to rate it 2-3 stars.

 

[Kiki]

I got alerts saying that I have 5 page ratings (also 1 and 10) is this what it means? But I don’t have a coop page.

It means you rated an article. Someone else's article.

 

[Nifty-Chicken]

We're SUPER close to the half-way mark of the number of coops with zero vs. 1 rating!

Coop pages with ratings:

#Coops - Ratings
1426 - 0 ratings
1338 - 1 ratings
162 - 2 ratings
45 - 3 ratings
13 - 4 ratings
27 - 5 ratings
5 - 6 ratings
6 - 7 ratings
5 - 9 ratings
1 - 11 ratings
1 - 12 ratings
1 - 14 ratings
1 - 15 ratings

Member's ratings:
331 - BlackHackle
263 - SavKel&RynKel
232 - Hope Hughes
164 - 21hens-incharge
137 - Cyprus
119 - KikisGirls
103 - sumi
70 - Yorkshire Coop
62 - OhZark Biddies
33 - Nardo
32 - PNW_Peepers
28 - Rose Quartz
25 - karenerwin

 

[Kiki]

(my cheer leading voice)
Let's go raters let's go!
Clap clap.

 

[Abriana]

It means you rated an article. Someone else's article.

Oh