Since Gold Legbars lay white/tinted eggs, and have no crest so that will not work. They'd have to be the the American Gold Crested, Blue Egg-Laying Legbar & that's absurd. Gold Legbar is already an established breed, and the more colorful birds that most of us have/many prefer do not fit that breed Standard. The more colorful CCLs were represented and sold as Crested Cream Legbars, also, and in fact those are the birds that started the whole thing in America. It's a little more than insulting to suggest that we rename our CCLs with a name that's sure to be rejected.. considering the first sentence. There HAS to be a way to describe the variation, whether it's as a 2nd variety like American Crested Cream Legbar may be appropriate, since the lighter birds are geared toward the English Standard. Since the colorful birds are already here and being bred, with proper documentation, exposure at shows, once the lighter CCLs are in the SOP.. the time & documentation, show/exhibit exposure, requirements could already be met.
Would/could that speed things up for a 2nd variety of CCL?
kinda seems like we as americans would look like were lazy and just gave up on the hard work to the rest of the world especially the UK. And not willing to go for the long haul if we gave up on our cream legbars settling for a gold variety as our standard. then what happens when the recessive cream shows up will it be considered a cull. Or is everyone thinking our legbars can be like the bbs genetics sometimes you get black (golds) sometimes you get blue(cream). Seems kinda silly.