The Legbar Thread!

Hi Puhi, I'm not touching your sex question with a 10 foot pole.
tongue2.gif


But yes the British Standard does include a crest, and in fact they are breeding towards a rather large crest there. You can read in the thread where we fashioned the proposed US standard, post number two lists the British standard. https://www.backyardchickens.com/t/713115/cream-legbar-working-group-standard-of-perfection "Crest cream and grey, some chestnut permissible." appears under both male and female. It does not specify size. The proposed US standard under "male" reads, "Crest: Small, well back from the eyes with narrow feathers falling off the back of the head to below the blade of the comb." Under female it reads, "Crest: Medium, affixed at the forefront of the skull on both sides of the base of the comb and running length of comb. Rising well in front so as not to obstruct the eyes, with feathers narrow and falling off the back of the head to below the blade of the comb. "

Although they are supposed to be good layers, it is hard to get a number pinned down. I have heard everything from 180 up to 210 or so. In good laying season I'm getting 5 eggs per week from each hen, and I am pretty pleased with that. I have not had any Cream Legbars go broody yet, either, which affects those yearly numbers. It's something we won't know for sure for a few years even if we asked everyone in the UK because our stock is different in many ways from their stock.
 
Last edited:
@Brada Puhi, I didn't get to read your earlier question about your birds' behavior before it was edited. But more than pheromones, it seems like a Roo should be following both comb color change signals and hen behavior before attempting to mount. This is not to say that some Roos don't try to have their way when the girls are not yet ready. But in my limited experience, if the girls are not ready or not interested they fight back. If they're just young to maturity they give in within a day or two after a few raised hackles. If they don't accept your boy as their superior then he is in for a lonely road...
 
KPenley, are you talking about only Legbars or chickens in general? While my Legbars fit your description, that hasn't been my experience with other breeds. Gang rape comes to mind. I even lost a hen when they didn't let her come up for air, so to speak. I don't have those roos any more.
 
Aloha, Thanks for your reply Kpenley. She at least lets him come near her and they sleep on the same and only roost bar. But she doesn't let him eat the treats, like lettuce and mealy worms. She might be open to mating soon though. She's just not going to be his dominee(couldn't use the word I was thinking of). He crowed 4 times this morning until I went out there and yelled at him and tried to catch him. Haha.

kden, puhi
 
KPenley, are you talking about only Legbars or chickens in general? While my Legbars fit your description, that hasn't been my experience with other breeds. Gang rape comes to mind. I even lost a hen when they didn't let her come up for air, so to speak. I don't have those roos any more.

Just Legbars. IMO they are much more gentle with their hens than other breeds, like you have experienced.
 
Puhi the "Cream Legbars" thread has been much more active the last few weeks, you can read up more there.

Crossing my fingers I finally get a pullet hatch next Sunday... just as I finished up my orders and was ready to start saving pullets for myself I am getting super male-heavy hatches, of course!
 
I have thought a lot about the problems as USPS and they are really in a precarious position.  Congress wants them to act like a real business yet will not allow them to make business decisions and frankly a number of lawmakers would just as soon privatize the whole thing. If that happens you can say good bye to more than just Saturday service--any route not profitable (try all rural routes and routes in the fly-over states) will be next on the chopping block. Remember they receive $0 from the government to operate.

The US has 5% of the worlds population and the USPS carries 40% of the world's mail (that's 160,000,000,000 pieces of mail a year) over the largest geographical area and the largest number postal addresses in the world. You can mail a letter from rural Maine all the way to Hawaii for $0.46. It should be more to cover costs but the USPS will have to go to Congress to get even a one cent increase in cost. What kind of system has a business manager have to go to an overseer (who can't even get their own budget in the black) who doesn't think they should exist to get permission to make necessary business decisions?

USPS has been mandated to prefund all of the employee benefits for the future employees (other agencies do not have to do this). Why??--is Congress requiring this so that when they privatize the employees will be pre-funded?

I suggest that when everyone contacts their congressmen about this one rate hike,  they may also reflect on a world where there is no USPS and only UPS and FedEX and rate hikes are not passed through for the public to comment on as they are now.  Imperfect as they are, I personally would like to see the USPS continue on as an entity and I will be emphasizing that to my Congressman--- I do not want to USPS to stop delivery of all mail by privatizing them. Sorry for the soapbox and, no, I have no relatives that work there.

ETA: thanks for the link!  When I clicked over they are undergoing system maintenance until 9pm tonight so I'll have to remember to do it tomorrow.

I received some info on this....still waiting to find out from my postmaster about the extra charge for chicks ( she's going to look it up for me). This has not been implemented yet but will be soon.
Priority mail will become:
Priority one day
Priority two day
Priority three day
Priority Express will simply be guaranteed delivery on one of these days
The former Express mail will won't exist other then as above. The major change and I think the reason for the additional charge is that there will now be up to $100 insurance coverage for all priority mail/priority express packages.
FYI - why the P.O. has to prefund retirement is because the PO is paying for all the other government employees retirement... Its not kept in a separate fund...and is being spent on All current guberment retirees- not much different then the problems social security is facing:p
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom